Interesting and insightful analysis from a Guardian columnist. I hope this
is a suitable answer to those such as Louis Proyect, or indeed that
hysterical ex-Maoist suffering from a case of acute Slavophilia,
Owen: Consider this a first warning. No personalizing.
Macdonald Stainsby,
The same is not true in Belarus, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan or Georgia, or
indeed Russia. Serbia's revolution was prompted by special factors, in
particular 10 years of pointless and lost wars. That may make Serbia a
unique exception which will not be repeated elsewhere. But the higher
Hi Mac
This is awful stuff.
The author of this piece is assuming two falsities: 1, that the "revolution"
in
Yugoslavia must have been a popular one,
Frankly if that revolution was not "popular" to use your vocabulary, then I
really am at a lost as to what is a "popular" revolution by
Owen:
I'm sure the money was very useful for banners and posters and buying
mansions for opposition leaders but it doesn't really explain why hundreds
of thousands of workers and peasants took to the streets of the country and
seized control of the means of production. How did imperialist money
Testing.
___
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international
-Original Message-
From: Owen Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 2:44 PM
Subject: [L-I] Serbia a "typical postcommunist state"
Interesting and insightful analysis from a Guardian columnist.
Really? Let's look at it.
En relación a [L-I] Argentine unions join forces for nationwide,
el 17 Nov 00, a las 14:09, Johannes Schneider dijo:
I am sure comrades from Argentina will keep us updated.
Johannes
I will, certainly. For the time being, what is happening could be summed up like
this:
The De la Rúa
