Re: Engelbart's NLS

2010-04-08 Thread ne1uno
On Mar 24, 12:07 am, June Kim wrote: > Hello, > > As I embarked on the journey of learning and using Leo, it constantly > reminded me of Engelbart's NLS[1]. [] > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLS_%28computer_system%29 > > Were orginators of Leo aware of NLS, and did they take any concepts from it

Re: OT: Memristors

2010-04-08 Thread Matt Wilkie
> This is going to be big: > > http://www.fastcompany.com/1610755/hp-memristors-semiconductors-chips-memory-science-flash-ram-physics-electronics heheh. I'm still waiting for the algae-based computer I read about a decade ago, source unfortunately forgotten and not easily google-able. As I recall

Re: OT: Memristors

2010-04-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Apr 8, 12:07 pm, "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > This is going to be big: And one more link: http://www.hpl.hp.com/news/2010/apr-jun/memristor.html EKR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-edi

Re: OT: Memristors

2010-04-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Apr 8, 12:07 pm, "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > This is going to be big: >From the HP FAQ: http://www.hpl.hp.com/news/2008/apr-jun/memristor_faq.html Why is memristance important? It turns out that memristance is becoming stronger as the feature sizes in circuits are getting smaller. At some poin

OT: Memristors

2010-04-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
This is going to be big: http://www.fastcompany.com/1610755/hp-memristors-semiconductors-chips-memory-science-flash-ram-physics-electronics For subscribers to Nature: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7290/full/nature08940.html Edward -- You received this message because you are subs

Re: Please contribute: thoughts about auto-completion

2010-04-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:05 PM, tfer wrote: > >> Okay, you've worn me down, where is the codewise stuff today, could >> not find it in trunk, and there is no codewise branch anymore. https://code.launchpad.net/~leo-editor-team/codewise/tr

Re: Please contribute: thoughts about auto-completion

2010-04-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Edward K. Ream wrote: > >> 2. The actual code is at >> https://code.launchpad.net/~villemvainio/codewise/trunk >> >> Ville, could you give me access to this branch?  I have some changes I >> would like to m

Re: Please contribute: thoughts about auto-completion

2010-04-08 Thread Ville M. Vainio
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:05 PM, tfer wrote: > Okay, you've worn me down, where is the codewise stuff today, could > not find it in trunk, and there is no codewise branch anymore. > > what is the data structure and how are you indexing into it? In addition to links posted by edward already: - ou

Re: Please contribute: thoughts about auto-completion

2010-04-08 Thread Ville M. Vainio
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Edward K. Ream wrote: > 2. The actual code is at > https://code.launchpad.net/~villemvainio/codewise/trunk > > Ville, could you give me access to this branch?  I have some changes I > would like to make. Ok, leo-editor-team now owns that branch. Feel free to comm

Re: Please contribute: thoughts about auto-completion

2010-04-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote: > I may sound like a broken record, but this is all taken care of by > codewise / ctags scheme... Earlier today I downloaded and installed ctags for Windows. There is now a binary installer--I'm not sure whether there was such a thing the l

Re: Please contribute: thoughts about auto-completion

2010-04-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: > >> I agree.  I was thinking that the user would build python_cmpltns.py. >> We probably don't want that, but probably do want to cache data for >> standard modules somewhere. > > I ma

Re: Please contribute: thoughts about auto-completion

2010-04-08 Thread tfer
On Apr 8, 3:06 am, "Ville M. Vainio" wrote: > I may sound like a broken record, but this is all taken care of by > codewise / ctags scheme... Okay, you've worn me down, where is the codewise stuff today, could not find it in trunk, and there is no codewise branch anymore. what is the data stru

Re: Please contribute: thoughts about auto-completion

2010-04-08 Thread Ville M. Vainio
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: > I agree.  I was thinking that the user would build python_cmpltns.py. > We probably don't want that, but probably do want to cache data for > standard modules somewhere. I may sound like a broken record, but this is all taken care of by co

Re: Please contribute: thoughts about auto-completion

2010-04-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:46 PM, tfer wrote: > > > On Apr 7, 1:51 pm, "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > >> However, the real problem is inferring (deducing) the type of x.y.z >> given only x as the starting point.  In general, this is a hard >> problem.  This morning I thought that some slight of hand mig