On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 8:39 PM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
wrote:
> Wow, quite the revolution in the short time I was away :-)
Welcome back :-)
The code is cleaner, and some of the never-used calls in the api are
gone, but the widget code still presents the same (inter) face to
Leo's core. S
How can you tell if qscitilla is active?
I have @bool qt-use-scintilla = True and
from PyQt4 import QtGui,Qsci
succeeds, but otherwise I see no difference - perhaps that's because
it's working so well? :)
Cheers -Terry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
This is a long, detailed post. It's not an Engineering Notebook post
because it may be of general interest. I hope to get comments from the
usual suspects.
I have spent several pleasant days making the Scintilla widget pretty much
fully functional. In the process, I have learned enough about
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:55 AM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
wrote:
> How can you tell if qscitilla is active?
On my machines, you will see a light gray border, maybe 2 pixels, on the left.
Or you could print c.frame.body.wrapper.widget ;-)
Edward
--
You received this message because you are
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> Now that Scintilla does not seem much of a "salvation", we must,
> somehow, work around the QTextEdit loss-of-data bug that Terry's
> benchmark script implicitly demonstrates. My full bug report is:
> https://bugreports.qt-projec
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:39 AM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
> "Edward K. Ream" wrote:
>> My full bug report is:
>> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-41153
>
> Will be interesting to see how they respond to that - does the bug
> exis
On Monday, September 8, 2014 8:25:49 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 8:39 PM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
>
> The major drawback of those is that they use plain plain text editors,
> and not Leo body
> > editors. free_layout should be able to completely replace the
I'll mention a perennial wishlist item:
- persistent multiple editors
I vaguely recall that Terry's stuff can provide that feature if I
correctly write out the state and reload it next session.
That's too much for my little brain to remember, but if that
capability exists, could it be registered w
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:21:02 -0500
Kent Tenney wrote:
> I'll mention a perennial wishlist item:
> - persistent multiple editors
>
> I vaguely recall that Terry's stuff can provide that feature if I
> correctly write out the state and reload it next session.
Not really - I think there was some cod
I've just pushed a cleanup of Leo's qt tree code in qt_tree.py. The new
code eliminates the the BaseNativeTreeWidget class and moves all the
functional code from the BaseNativeTreeWidget class to the LeoQtTree class,
eliminating code that existed only to be over-ridden. Sheesh.
LeoQtTree is
On Monday, September 8, 2014 2:49:29 PM UTC-5, Terry wrote:
> Basically we need the body editor to not be a singleton thing, and then
free_layout can do all kinds of things, including persistent multiple
editors. Sounds like Edward's looking into the possibilities again, so
fingers crossed.
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> On Monday, September 8, 2014 2:49:29 PM UTC-5, Terry wrote:
>
> > Basically we need the body editor to not be a singleton thing, and
> > then
> free_layout can do all kinds of things, including persistent multiple
> editors. So
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> I've just pushed a cleanup of Leo's qt tree code in qt_tree.py. The new
> code eliminates the the BaseNativeTreeWidget class and moves all the
> functional code from the BaseNativeTreeWidget class to the LeoQtTree class,
> eliminating code
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:44 PM, EmanueL Czirai wrote:
> if isinstance(widget,QtGui.QTextEdit):
> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'QTextEdit'
What platform are you on. Do you have Qt installed?
Have you been able to run Leo before today?
Edward
--
You received this messa
I'm on linux manjaro(based on archlinux)
Linux manji 3.17.0-rc4-gd030671 #83 SMP Mon Sep 8 15:35:58 CEST 2014 x86_64
GNU/Linux
I've been able to run only Leo 4.11 final, but never the git version yet.
I've qt5 installed
extra/pyqt5-common 5.3.1-1 [installed]
extra/python-pyqt5 5.3.1-1 [installed]
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:19 PM, EmanueL Czirai wrote:
> I've been able to run only Leo 4.11 final, but never the git version yet.
That makes sense ;-)
> I've qt5 installed
> extra/pyqt5-common 5.3.1-1 [installed]
> extra/python-pyqt5 5.3.1-1 [installed]
> extra/qt5-base 5.3.1-1 (qt qt5) [instal
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> Otoh, I'm not sure whether anyone is using Qt5 for Leo, despite the
> support in leoQt.py. I'll see whether I can get Leo working with Qt5
> on ubuntu and report back.
Happily, I got the same traceback you did. The problem is a Qt4/5
gotc
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>> Otoh, I'm not sure whether anyone is using Qt5 for Leo, despite the
>> support in leoQt.py. I'll see whether I can get Leo working with Qt5
>> on ubuntu and report back.
>
> Happily, I got the same traceback you did. The problem is a Qt4/
Cool. Starts up.
I see some Qt4 related errors which are maybe harmless? but mentioning them
just in case you'll want to address
--
$ ./launchLeo.py
** isPython3: True
Leo 4.11 final, build 20140908184639, Mon Sep 8 18:46:39 CDT 2014
Git re
Figured out how to run tests.
This is while python-pyqt4 is not installed:
Ran 864 tests in 101.304s
FAILED (failures=11)
I know this isn't really useful but there's too much output to even know
what to paste:)
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:11 AM, EmanueL Czirai wrote:
> Cool. Starts up.
> I see
20 matches
Mail list logo
