Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-14 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, gatesphere wrote: > To help with this process, I've renamed the current github leo-editor repo > to leo-editor-mirror, so that the true repo can now occupy leo-editor, when > it is created. I've also updated all the scripting and ReadTheDocs > settings to reflect

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-10 Thread Jacob Peck
On 1/10/2014 9:35 AM, Jack Kuan wrote: Is the git repo up in github? I can't see it under https://github.com/leo-editor Is it open to public? It's just for testing at the moment. Any changes pushed to the repo will be blown away when the final migration happens. It's also already several re

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-10 Thread Jack Kuan
Is the git repo up in github? I can't see it under https://github.com/leo-editor Is it open to public? Thanks Jack On Friday, January 3, 2014 11:55:56 PM UTC-5, Terry wrote: > > gf's post made me realize my reposting of Ville's reposting failed, > here it is - question for you Jacob / Matt...

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-05 Thread Matt Wilkie
> > Well, at the moment, I'm trying to convince bzr that it does indeed know > how to do 'fast-export'... :) make sure you have gobs of free space, the raw bzr export file for 2002-2006 is 3.2GB. -matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor"

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-05 Thread gatesphere
On 1/5/2014 1:47 PM, Matt Wilkie wrote: On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:05 AM, gatesphere > wrote: Matt, I saw the leo-cvs-2002-2006 repo -- are you going to do different repos for different points in Leo's history? If so, we could probably get the leo-edito

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-05 Thread Matt Wilkie
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:05 AM, gatesphere wrote: > Matt, I saw the leo-cvs-2002-2006 repo -- are you going to do different > repos for different points in Leo's history? If so, we could probably get > the leo-editor repo with just bzr's history up and running fairly quickly, > and then backtra

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-05 Thread gatesphere
To help with this process, I've renamed the current github leo-editor repo to leo-editor-mirror, so that the true repo can now occupy leo-editor, when it is created. I've also updated all the scripting and ReadTheDocs settings to reflect this. Once the migration to git is complete, I'll remov

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-05 Thread Ville M. Vainio
Yes, bzr trunk will be enough for main git repo, and it's not like we would be deleting the old repos in the process. On Jan 5, 2014 1:50 PM, "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Matt Wilkie wrote: > >> this is a more informative starting point >> http://stackoverflow.com/q

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-05 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Matt Wilkie wrote: > this is a more informative starting point > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19930832/converting-big-bzr-repository-to-git-what-to-expect. > Initial experiments look like it won't be too bad. I'll have more to report > later. > Thanks for t

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-04 Thread Matt Wilkie
Pulling the years 2002-2006 into git went smoothly enough, following the guide linked previously, but 2006-2008 is giving some trouble. The Launchpad auto-import version of this repo drops all the tags (e.g. "v4.4.1") which is important history IMO, and has a different parent directory than the ear

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-04 Thread gatesphere
On 1/3/2014 11:55 PM, Terry Brown wrote: Matt and Jacob - it seemed that between you you'd kind of done most of the leg-work for getting Leo's VCS history in one place and moving it to git - I'm not saying we should move right now, but just wondering how high the barrier is, not very, perhaps? On

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-04 Thread Matt Wilkie
this is a more informative starting point http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19930832/converting-big-bzr-repository-to-git-what-to-expect. Initial experiments look like it won't be too bad. I'll have more to report later. -matt On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Matt Wilkie wrote: > > On Fri, Jan

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-04 Thread Matt Wilkie
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Terry Brown wrote: > Matt and Jacob - it seemed that between you you'd kind of done most of > the leg-work for getting Leo's VCS history in one place and moving it > to git > Jake has done all of the git and github work on Leo itself. I've just contributed some sn

Re: Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-04 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Friday, January 3, 2014 10:55:56 PM UTC-6, Terry wrote: > bzr is more than enough DVCS for Leo, the only drawback is "Ohh, you're > not using git...". > Longer term bzr may atrophy, I guess, although I imagine it will be > usable for many years to come. > I agree. Leo should move to gi

Fw: [Leo Editor] "Emacs needs to move to git" (from bzr)

2014-01-03 Thread Terry Brown
gf's post made me realize my reposting of Ville's reposting failed, here it is - question for you Jacob / Matt... Begin forwarded message: On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 07:45:25 -0800 (PST) "Ville Vainio (Google+)" wrote: http://classic.slashdot.org/story/14/01/02/1425203 "Eric S. Raymond, co-