On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 5:51 AM vitalije wrote:
> Heh. I just realized that Vitalije's post was first made in February, not
>> yesterday,
>
>
> I was also surprised to see new topic and "me" as author of it. For a
> moment I thought it was some bug in google. :-)
>
Hehe. I thought exactly the
>
> Heh. I just realized that Vitalije's post was first made in February, not
> yesterday,
I was also surprised to see new topic and "me" as author of it. For a
moment I thought it was some bug in google. :-)
Vitalije
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 5:17:45 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:42 AM vitalije wrote:
>
> Last summer I had this idea of using another open source editor and adding
>> features unique to Leo. I did considered several editors implemented in
>> browser or bro
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:42 AM vitalije wrote:
Last summer I had this idea of using another open source editor and adding
> features unique to Leo. I did considered several editors implemented in
> browser or browser-like environment. That includes Atom, but also
> LightTable, NightCode, and few
>
> My conceptual solution to this was/is "What If Topics Were Folders?",
> topics being the twiki version of Nodes. Basically: every topic is a
> container, within the container if the default file exists, display that
> using the filetype's default rendering mechanism (think web servers and
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Matt Wilkie wrote:
>
My conceptual solution to this was/is "What If Topics Were Folders?"
I always liked the MacOS scheme of allowing folders to be treated as files
with attributes. But Linux and Windows don't do this, so Leo has to have
sentinel lines. Exce
> After a while I thought that easiest way to connect the two is
> implementing some kind of special file system. In this (let's call it
> LeoFS), filenames are gnxes and file content is the body or maybe (headline
> + '\n' + body). All these editors have some kind of tree representation of
>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:42 AM, vitalije wrote:
Last summer I had this idea of using another open source editor and adding
> features unique to Leo. I did considered several editors implemented in
> browser or browser-like environment. That includes Atom, but also
> LightTable, NightCode, and fe
Last summer I had this idea of using another open source editor and adding
features unique to Leo. I did considered several editors implemented in
browser or browser-like environment. That includes Atom, but also
LightTable, NightCode, and few others. Even old jEdit came to my mind.
All these e