Any thoughts Matt about using GCC-4 as the default SVN build compiler?
I only ask again as last time I asked it seemed the respondents were
positive about the idea. I can't think of anyone that said it was
a bad idea. I don't consider your input as a "bad idea" as much as
a "careful consideration"
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/27/05 00:47 CDT:
> Should we substitute this library for the Openquicktime library?
I think so, but I didn't want to suggest it as I wasn't sure who/why
put the Openquicktime library in the book. libquicktime likes
jpeg-mmx and both are moving targets right now
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone at all use the Openquicktime library for anything useful?
>
> 5. There is a better quicktime library which *is* referenced as a
> dependency in BLFS packages at http://libquicktime.sourceforge.net/
Should we substitute this library for the Openqui
Hi all,
Does anyone at all use the Openquicktime library for anything useful?
I would like to remove this package from BLFS for the following
reasons:
1. It is a dead project. No new stable release in over 4 years.
2. There is a mention of an optional downloadable codec, but no
mention what to
Do away with everything you owe without paying another dime. End the calls,
End the payments!
As it turns out most lendors are doing something illegal. Unbelievable but
true!
Join us for in-depth details about our system at 0 charge or obligation.
You have nothing to lose and plenty to gain.
ht
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:43:46 +0200, Dan Osterrath wrote:
> But then anoher question: Why does /usr/include/bits/stdio-lock.h from
> glibc-2.3.4-20040701 include lowlevellock.h, which does not exist on my
> system? Did it exists in the kernel headers which were deleted after
> successfully compilin
On Friday 26 August 2005 17:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> It rasies the issue of what to do with the income. Gerard is the
> copyright holder and he has spent a significant amount of personal funds
> on the project.
This is true. I also have costs regarding lfs (at least for the german
translation)
Richard A Downing wrote:
> I have always trusted the BLFS book as the source of all this
> information :-)
We've always done our best here, but things sometimes slip by.
configure checks for a lot of things because it was designed to work for
multiple unixes. A check may or may not be meaningful
Thomas Reitelbach wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> some of you might remember me, i'm the german translator of the book since
> some time now.
>
> A few weeks ago at Linuxtag in germany i met a publisher who is very
> interested in publishing my german translation of 6.1 as printed book here in
> ge
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:52:09PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> If you have instances where you click on a URL link, or from the
> command line issue a URL parameter to Firefox and it opens a new
> browser window, when you'd rather it open a new tab in an existing
> browser window, issue the f
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The recent discussion of dependencies brings up an interesting
> question. How *do* you actually determine what is used in a
> package?
> So, we must rule out ldd as a definitive method of determining a
> dependency. Though it can be used as a helpful tool, tho
Richard A Downing wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>>The LFS book(s) link to Richard's Essential Pre-Reading Hint in the
>>Prerequisites section, as you may already be aware. The hint, in turn,
>>mentions that there is a better maintained version at
>>http://www.109bean.org.uk/lfsdocs/LFS-prereadin
Hello people,
some of you might remember me, i'm the german translator of the book since
some time now.
A few weeks ago at Linuxtag in germany i met a publisher who is very
interested in publishing my german translation of 6.1 as printed book here in
germany.
I mailed Gerard two times about t
Randy McMurchy wrote:
So, we must rule out ldd as a definitive method of determining a
dependency. Though it can be used as a helpful tool, though.
So, how do we check?
`ldd' isn't the most reliable...apparently. I think the recommended
method is:
readelf -d [dynamic lib/bin] | grep NEEDE
Your Yahoo! ID is: jain8210
Your password for this account has recently been changed. You don't
need to do anything, this message is simply a notification to protect
the security of your account.
Please note: your new password may take awhile to activate. If it
doesn't work on your first try
15 matches
Mail list logo
