Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: M.Canales.es wrote: UTF-8 .- Not yet in the official LFS repository (when will be added?), but is the most problematic one. Alexander, if you send to me a patch against current trunk, I will try to create an updated patch against the

Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
M.Canales.es wrote: UTF-8 .- Not yet in the official LFS repository (when will be added?), but is the most problematic one. Alexander, if you send to me a patch against current trunk, I will try to create an updated patch against the indented trunk. This will tak

Re: kmod.c

2005-11-11 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Nathan Coulson wrote: On 11/2/05, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Heya, These instructions appear at least in the x86_64 Multilib CLFS book. (I didn't check the others): "Also, ensure that the kernel does not attempt to pass hotplugging events

Re: Progress of the build order changes

2005-11-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Hey Guys, Just a heads up. Stage 2 is done. The second set of logs (from the first alphabetical build) are in my home dir. http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/ Also, there is a diff of the two sets of logs - mostly the differences seem

Re: Progress of the build order changes

2005-11-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Hey Guys, Just a heads up. Stage 2 is done. The second set of logs (from the first alphabetical build) are in my home dir. http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/ -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/

[Fwd: firefox "mailto:" protocol configuration]

2005-11-11 Thread Christian Bendele
Hello, in freenode irc's #lfs-support, which i frequent on a regular base, a question came up several times during the last weeks: How do I configure firefox so that it automatically runs thunderbird (or any other mail client for that matter) when I click on a "mailto:"; link, or when a html

Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread Matthew Burgess
Randy McMurchy wrote: M.Canales.es wrote these words on 11/11/05 12:30 CST: I don't remember any discussion about the "alphabetical merge". Is this something that is deemed so trivial that it isn't worthy of community discussion before implementation? The 'svn merge' command is of course tri

Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread M.Canales.es
El Viernes, 11 de Noviembre de 2005 19:41, Randy McMurchy escribió: > M.Canales.es wrote these words on 11/11/05 12:30 CST: > I don't remember any discussion about the "alphabetical merge". Is > this something that is deemed so trivial that it isn't worthy of > community discussion before implemen

Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread Randy McMurchy
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 11/11/05 12:30 CST: > In resume, can I to start indenting LFS-SVN?, or should to wait until after > 6.1.1 release and the alphabetical merge? I don't remember any discussion about the "alphabetical merge". Is this something that is deemed so trivial that it isn'

LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread M.Canales.es
Hi ! I would to start indenting the LFS-SVN sources this weekend. I hope that it will take only a few days (more of the indented blocks, like the "Contents of ..." sections, can be ported from CLFS, the big work will be to indent the Spanish translation sources :-/ ) But that meant that no aut

Re: kmod.c

2005-11-11 Thread Nathan Coulson
On 11/2/05, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > Heya, > > > > These instructions appear at least in the x86_64 Multilib CLFS book. (I > > didn't check the others): > > > > "Also, ensure that the kernel does not attempt to pass hotplugging > > events to user

Re: Progress of the build order changes

2005-11-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: and will post the logs there when I'm done. (I'm keeping the on my machine too, so I can compare those if necessary.) And after that, I'll This was supposed to read: (I'm keeping the binaries on my machine too, ...) Don't know how that slipped out of there... :) -- JH

RE: Progress of the build order changes

2005-11-11 Thread David Fix
>>> I've got the necessary changes made in the new alphabetical branch. >> >> >> Quick question... :P What's the alphabetical branch? :) > > http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684 Oho! :) Thanks. :) Dave -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ:

Re: Progress of the build order changes

2005-11-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
David Fix wrote: I've got the necessary changes made in the new alphabetical branch. Quick question... :P What's the alphabetical branch? :) http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684 -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch

RE: Progress of the build order changes

2005-11-11 Thread David Fix
> I've got the necessary changes made in the new alphabetical branch. Quick question... :P What's the alphabetical branch? :) Dave -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Progress of the build order changes

2005-11-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Hey Guys, Just a heads up. I've got the necessary changes made in the new alphabetical branch. There's a rendered version in my home dir on the LFS server, in case anyone else would like to generally follow it: http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/ Also there is the logs from my build of

[Fwd: Re: Which version of 2.6.11 is most stable]

2005-11-11 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
That's something to consider for 6.1.1 release. Looks like we really have to bump the kernel version or hunt for the security fixes ourselves :( -- Alexander E. Patrakov --- Begin Message --- On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 03:38:13PM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote: > > Dear All, > > I am in the phase of dev