Re: Merry Christmas

2005-12-25 Thread silverspurg
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Gerard Beekmans wrote: Merry Christmas to you all. I hope it is a good one for everybody. Easy on the spiced egg nogg ;) Sip... don't gulp. Gulping would be rough. Merry Christmas! Steven -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfr

Re: UTF-8 book is ready for merging

2005-12-25 Thread Archaic
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 11:41:21AM +, Andrew Benton wrote: > > The sooner it's merged, the more testing it will get before LFS-6.2 Agreed. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http

Re: Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Gottfried Haider wrote: Yes, this is the only relevant difference between 2.6.12.0 and svn. so there is no problem adding a file to /usr/include/linux after the system has been build (and glibc has been linked against it), if I understand you correctly? This applies only to this particula

Re: Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Son, 2005-12-25 at 17:22 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Gottfried Haider wrote: > > >I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus > >Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6. > > > >I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running a

Re: Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Gottfried Haider
> Yes, this is the only relevant difference between 2.6.12.0 and svn. so there is no problem adding a file to /usr/include/linux after the system has been build (and glibc has been linked against it), if I understand you correctly? thanks|happy holidays Gottfried Haider -- http://linuxfromscratch

Re: Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Gottfried Haider wrote: Hello list, I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6. I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running an IMAP server).. so can I simply copy inotif.h (from Linux-Libc-H

Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 and inotify.h

2005-12-25 Thread Gottfried Haider
Hello list, I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6. I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running an IMAP server).. so can I simply copy inotif.h (from Linux-Libc-Headers-svn) into the header

Re: UTF-8 book is ready for merging

2005-12-25 Thread Andrew Benton
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: From now on, I don't see any substantial possible improvements, and see no value in delaying the merge. The sooner it's merged, the more testing it will get before LFS-6.2 Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscra

FAQ: Package management

2005-12-25 Thread Mark Rosenstand
Hi there, Not knowing anything about the development of LFS (and in the hopes of not having to) I would like to suggest two (faily big) package management systems to be mentioned on the FAQ: - pacman from Arch Linux It does dependency tracking, supports (optionally remote) package repositori

UTF-8 book is ready for merging

2005-12-25 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Hello, The UTF-8 book has been updated. The main change is addition of text about mounting filesystems with Windows origin, such as FAT and SMBFS. From now on, I don't see any substantial possible improvements, and see no value in delaying the merge. The patch against the current SVN is at: