On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
Merry Christmas to you all. I hope it is a good one for everybody. Easy on
the spiced egg nogg ;)
Sip... don't gulp. Gulping would be rough.
Merry Christmas!
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfr
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 11:41:21AM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
>
> The sooner it's merged, the more testing it will get before LFS-6.2
Agreed.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http
Gottfried Haider wrote:
Yes, this is the only relevant difference between 2.6.12.0 and svn.
so there is no problem adding a file to /usr/include/linux after the
system has been build (and glibc has been linked against it), if I
understand you correctly?
This applies only to this particula
On Son, 2005-12-25 at 17:22 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Gottfried Haider wrote:
>
> >I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus
> >Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6.
> >
> >I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running a
> Yes, this is the only relevant difference between 2.6.12.0 and svn.
so there is no problem adding a file to /usr/include/linux after the
system has been build (and glibc has been linked against it), if I
understand you correctly?
thanks|happy holidays
Gottfried Haider
--
http://linuxfromscratch
Gottfried Haider wrote:
Hello list,
I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus
Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6.
I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running an IMAP
server).. so can I simply copy inotif.h (from Linux-Libc-H
Hello list,
I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus
Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6.
I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running an IMAP
server).. so can I simply copy inotif.h (from Linux-Libc-Headers-svn)
into the header
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
From now on, I don't see any substantial possible improvements, and see
no value in delaying the merge.
The sooner it's merged, the more testing it will get before LFS-6.2
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscra
Hi there,
Not knowing anything about the development of LFS (and in the hopes of
not having to) I would like to suggest two (faily big) package
management systems to be mentioned on the FAQ:
- pacman from Arch Linux
It does dependency tracking, supports (optionally remote) package
repositori
Hello,
The UTF-8 book has been updated. The main change is addition of text
about mounting filesystems with Windows origin, such as FAT and SMBFS.
From now on, I don't see any substantial possible improvements, and see
no value in delaying the merge. The patch against the current SVN is at:
10 matches
Mail list logo