Re: Udev error in serio with IBM TrackPoint

2006-05-04 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Chris Schwemmer wrote: Hi, I'm running a build of LFS-SVN (latest version). So far everything works fine, but during bootup I get an error message from udevd and the Send this bugreport... message. When the udev bootscript is running, I get this message on my terminal: udevd-event[992]:

Re: Kernel Headers Script [was: Rally the Troops LFS/BLFS/CLFS/Livecd too]

2006-05-04 Thread Jim Gifford
steve crosby wrote: On 5/4/06, Jim Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve, I just added a headers_list script that will look at the sources and pull all the headers and put them into a report. Let's run that and compare what I have in the script now to see what's missing.

Re: Kernel Headers Script [was: Rally the Troops LFS/BLFS/CLFS/Livecd too]

2006-05-04 Thread steve crosby
On 5/4/06, Jim Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I probably need to document that a little better. Basically you untar your program and tell it ./headers_list iptables-1.3.5 and it creates a report of all the headers needed for a build. That makes more sense ;) resulting asm-headers and

Re: Kernel Headers Script [was: Rally the Troops LFS/BLFS/CLFS/Livecd too]

2006-05-04 Thread steve crosby
On 5/4/06, Jim Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I probably need to document that a little better. Basically you untar your program and tell it ./headers_list iptables-1.3.5 and it creates a report of all the headers needed for a build. also below are results for ulog, a companion program to

Re: Udev error in serio with IBM TrackPoint

2006-05-04 Thread Chris Schwemmer
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: Does the attached kernel patch help? That patch (applied on a 2.6.16.13 kernel) fixes the warning from udevd. But, strangely enough, it does not remove the bugreport. Neither does the change in /etc/udev/rules.d/05-early.rules. It's not exactly a critical problem for

Re: What's Going on

2006-05-04 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 4 de Mayo de 2006 02:42, Archaic escribió: jhalfs was discussed in dozens of threads a long time ago. What you are arguing against is a method to test the book directly from it's XML. And that was one of the goals listed in the specifications when the work on the newxml format was

jhalfs

2006-05-04 Thread Ioan Ionita
Ok, I feel like a complete retard. I decided to give jhalfs a spin, but I can't figure out how to make the script run in the first place. I don't get all the stuff about symlinks in the README. if I want to build a Makefile for lfs, am I supposed to run ./lfs from the top directory? That file

Re: Chapter 24. X Window System - visual changes

2006-05-04 Thread Andrew Benton
Dan Nicholson wrote: the online user documentation explains this way better than I can and has some samples near the end. http://fontconfig.org/fontconfig-user.html To me, that looks a lot like file:///usr/share/doc/fontconfig/fontconfig-user.html or indeed man fonts-conf Andy --

Re: jhalfs

2006-05-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Ioan Ionita wrote: Ok, I feel like a complete retard. I decided to give jhalfs a spin, but I can't figure out how to make the script run in the first place. I don't get all the stuff about symlinks in the README. if I want to build a Makefile for lfs, am I supposed to run ./lfs from the top

Re: Chapter 24. X Window System - visual changes

2006-05-04 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 5/4/06, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote: the online user documentation explains this way better than I can and has some samples near the end. http://fontconfig.org/fontconfig-user.html To me, that looks a lot like

Re: What's Going on

2006-05-04 Thread Jim Gifford
The biggest problem I've had about the md5sums in ALFS is that they are ones we have created. We shouldn't be recreating them, but using the author's version. I know we have repackages items so they are .bz2, but that's not keeping a clean chain. That's my objection. If we are not going to

Re: What's Going on

2006-05-04 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 4 de Mayo de 2006 23:29, Jim Gifford escribió: The biggest problem I've had about the md5sums in ALFS is that they are ones we have created. We shouldn't be recreating them, but using the author's version. I know we have repackages items so they are .bz2, but that's not keeping a