Re: Fwd: machine donation

2006-05-25 Thread Shane Shields
Stef Bon wrote: Ok for a nice server I'm always interested, but 120 kg. What kind of beast is this?? http://www.ciao.co.uk/Digital_Server_7305__5358898 -- Shane Shields Registered LFS Compiler: 7582 To drink the WINE of success you must first seek the sayings of source Anyone sending u

Re: Home page for gzip

2006-05-25 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Chris Staub wrote: Currently, the book has www.gzip.org as the home page for gzip. I think it should point to the gzip page on gnu.org - http://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/. Gzip.org is clearly out-of-date (it says the current version is 1.2.4 and references a "beta" version of 1.3.3), and the g

Home page for gzip

2006-05-25 Thread Chris Staub
Currently, the book has www.gzip.org as the home page for gzip. I think it should point to the gzip page on gnu.org - http://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/. Gzip.org is clearly out-of-date (it says the current version is 1.2.4 and references a "beta" version of 1.3.3), and the gnu.org gzip page say

Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-25 Thread Jim Gifford
Joshua, I think you summarized everything up very well. Thank you. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Inconsistency on MTA dependencies look

2006-05-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 5/25/06, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I propose to change that to simply: a ( that provides a sendmail command) Adding, of course, the appropriate xreflabel="MTA" to server/mail/mail.xml That will do that dependencies on a MTA will look like current dependencies on X, i.e., poi

Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-25 Thread Joshua Murphy
On 5/24/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim Gifford wrote: > Matt, >I did respond, but you chose to ignore it. > > http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2006-May/057282.html > No, I didn't ignore it. I saw that you said "the rules are not that different".

Re: Fwd: machine donation

2006-05-25 Thread Stef Bon
Tushar Teredesai wrote: > Hi Guys: > > Jaap has a DEC Alpha 7305 for someone who is interested. Please see > his message below and if interested contact him directly. > > Only problem is the transport, it weights 120kg. and has the size of a > small fridge so shipping it isn't an option. > May

Fwd: machine donation

2006-05-25 Thread Tushar Teredesai
Hi Guys: Jaap has a DEC Alpha 7305 for someone who is interested. Please see his message below and if interested contact him directly. Here is a link to HP's spec sheet . Have fun. Tushar. -- Forwarded message -- From: Jaap S

Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-25 Thread TheOldFellow
Archaic wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:35:09PM +0100, TheOldFellow wrote: What I can't understand is why, when the CLFS rules have been working for months, that LFS had to reinvent the wheel? The LFS rules have existed since at least June 15, 2004. They predate the CLFS book. Yes, but