On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:43:55PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I used 'native' in my proposal earlier. 'generic' may be a bit more
> conservative, but I think 'native' would be better for most people. If
> you change it, how about adding another sentence that 'native' is an
> option but issues ma
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 10:19:42AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> Reading Greg's post again, if -mtune=generic is the default on
>> gcc-4.2, then I think that's what we should restore. Then the
>> explanation makes more sense: "-mtune=generic restores the default GCC
>> set
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 10:19:42AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Reading Greg's post again, if -mtune=generic is the default on
> gcc-4.2, then I think that's what we should restore. Then the
> explanation makes more sense: "-mtune=generic restores the default GCC
> settings from those implied by t
On Friday 05 October 2007 17:31:56 Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 07:25:48 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> grep Error /mnt/lfs/jhalfs/test-logs/065-glibc
> >> make[3]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
> >
Hi all,
I really don't know how to start and how to finish my email.
For a long time I wanted to explain my current situation, but believe it or
not, I didn't have neither these few minutes of my time.
My/Our life had changed in a such a drastic way that I don't/won't have time
in the near future
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:46:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>> Everything looks good to me, Bruce. Patches are always welcome :-)
>
> Why would I send a patch when I can just change it in svn? Woul dthat
> be OK?
Of course, feel free. Just so we don't c
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Everything looks good to me, Bruce. Patches are always welcome :-)
Why would I send a patch when I can just change it in svn? Woul dthat
be OK?
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:16:53 -0500, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead of overriding completely what Glibc's internal build system uses
> for CFLAGS, append the new flag to the existing contents of CFLAGS by
> making use of the special file configparms. The -mtune=native flag is
> al
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 10/5/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think adding -mtune=native will be fine so long as there are no test
>> regressions. Otherwise, Greg's suggestion of -mtune=generic seems very
>> safe.
>
> Reading Greg's post again, if -mtune=generic is the default o
On 10/5/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think adding -mtune=native will be fine so long as there are no test
> regressions. Otherwise, Greg's suggestion of -mtune=generic seems very
> safe.
Reading Greg's post again, if -mtune=generic is the default on
gcc-4.2, then I think that
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 07:25:48 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> grep Error /mnt/lfs/jhalfs/test-logs/065-glibc
>> make[3]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
>>
>> I'll be running a test on trunk now just to make sure that everyt
On 10/5/07, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We never really decided on what to do for -mtune on Glibc. See the end of
> Greg's post here:
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-September/060338.html
>
> And again his comments here:
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermai
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:15:09AM -0600, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:10:59 -0500, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Both your links are the same...
>
> Oh, sorry. Here's the one I left out:
>
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-September/060268.html
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:31:56 +0600, "Alexander E. Patrakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It is known that on different Intel CPUs, glibc chooses at runtime
> different algorithms for certain floating-point operations (grep for
> HWCAP_I386_XMM, for example, which corresponds to SSE support). So
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 07:25:48 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> grep Error /mnt/lfs/jhalfs/test-logs/065-glibc
> make[3]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
>
> I'll be running a test on trunk now just to make sure that everything is
> kosher.
The developme
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:52:49 +0200, "Richard Gill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/10/5, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> (-O2 -pipe -s -fno-strict-aliasing -mtune=i686) by default, and very
>
> Oops, I forgot to mention the -s I use too :-)
Well this thread certainly went off top
2007/10/5, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (-O2 -pipe -s -fno-strict-aliasing -mtune=i686) by default, and very
Oops, I forgot to mention the -s I use too :-)
--
Richard 'riri' GILL
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://riri.houbathecat.info
http://nasgaia.org
« Frimousse en excessivité
Richard Gill wrote:
> Hi successfully built the entire chapter 5, then start of chapter 6
> (because then I deviate), with the following flags for *all* software:
> CFLAGS="-O3 -pipe -march=i686 -mtune=i686"
> CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wno-deprecated"
>
> thus binutils and glibc are built with those flags
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:10:59 -0500, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both your links are the same...
Oh, sorry. Here's the one I left out:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-September/060268.html
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://
2007/10/5, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello All,
>
> We never really decided on what to do for -mtune on Glibc. See the end of
> Greg's post here:
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-September/060338.html
>
> And again his comments here:
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pi
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We never really decided on what to do for -mtune on Glibc. See the end of
> Greg's post here:
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-September/060338.html
>
> And again his comments here:
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-Se
Hello All,
We never really decided on what to do for -mtune on Glibc. See the end of
Greg's post here:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-September/060338.html
And again his comments here:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-September/060338.html
My opinion is that
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:00:26PM +0100, Athena wrote:
> Hello List
>
> I would really appreciate it if somebody would be able to help me with a
> little problem which I'm having with glibc-2.6.1 make check on the current
> LFS-DEV. I chatted to somebody on #lfs-support last night and they sugg
Hello List
I would really appreciate it if somebody would be able to help me with a
little problem which I'm having with glibc-2.6.1 make check on the current
LFS-DEV. I chatted to somebody on #lfs-support last night and they suggested
that I post my problem to this list.
So here goes
I'
Chris Staub wrote:
> In Chapter 6, there is this set of commands...
>
> for lib in curses ncurses form panel menu ; do \
> rm -vf /usr/lib/lib${lib}.so ; \
> echo "INPUT(-l${lib}w)" >/usr/lib/lib${lib}.so ; \
> ln -sfv lib${lib}w.a /usr/lib/lib${lib}.a ; \
> done
> ln -sfv libncurses
25 matches
Mail list logo
