Re: "unknown HZ value" message still appears in procps utils

2011-09-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
DJ Lucas wrote: > On 06/07/2011 05:16 AM, LANOUX Bertrand wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have noticed the "unknown HZ value" message still appears at boot >> time and under some unpredictable circumstances when running the ps >> command, even after applying the procps-3.2.8-fix_HZ_errors-1.patch >> (I

Diffutils default editor set to ed by default

2011-09-04 Thread DJ Lucas
Taken from cross-lfs: sed -i 's@\(^#define DEFAULT_EDITOR_PROGRAM \).*@\1"vi"@' lib/config.h Any reason not to do this in LFS? -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-

6.22. Pkg-config-0.26 the sed is error?

2011-09-04 Thread xinglp
This command sed -i -e '/!done/i/ longArg = NULL;' popt/popt.c create / longArg = NULL; -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: "unknown HZ value" message still appears in procps utils

2011-09-04 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/07/2011 05:16 AM, LANOUX Bertrand wrote: > Hi all, > > I have noticed the "unknown HZ value" message still appears at boot time and > under some unpredictable circumstances when running the ps command, even > after applying the procps-3.2.8-fix_HZ_errors-1.patch (I currently use a SMP, > 2

pcreposix

2011-09-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Hello, Now that pcre is part of the base LFS, I think you need to take into consideration how you will handle the conflict with the libc namespace, namely some of the functions declared in regex.h and their associated symbols in libc.so.6 The readme file (http://www.pcre.org/readme.txt) has th

Re: pkg-config tests

2011-09-04 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:59:56 -0700 Bryan Kadzban wrote: > poptGetNextOption, after it invokes the callback for > --define-variable=a=b (the operation of which sets the longArg local > variable), does not reset longArg to NULL. So on the next time through > its loop (after invoking the --define-v

Re: pkg-config tests

2011-09-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Doing some debugging, I'm making some progress. I made some debug >> printouts and in the first case got: >> >>required_pkgconfig_version 999.999 >> >> but in the second >> >>required_pkgconfig_version a=b >> >> (which for some reason returns a

Re: pkg-config tests

2011-09-04 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Doing some debugging, I'm making some progress. I made some debug > printouts and in the first case got: > >required_pkgconfig_version 999.999 > > but in the second > >required_pkgconfig_version a=b > > (which for some reason returns a positive number for > compar

Re: pkg-config tests

2011-09-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >> Eek, 1 test known to fail means that popt is not working as expected, >> and therefore some pkg-config functionality is broken. If you don't >> want to include popt in the base system, then I think it's better to >> track down what is broken in the bu

Re: binutils-2.21.1a.tar.bz2

2011-09-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
xinglp wrote: > chapter 6.13 > > cp -v ../binutils-2.21.1a/include/libiberty.h /usr/include > --> > cp -v ../binutils-2.21.1/include/libiberty.h /usr/include Fixed in svn. Thanks for the heads up. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscr

Re: binutils-2.21.1a.tar.bz2

2011-09-04 Thread xinglp
chapter 6.13 cp -v ../binutils-2.21.1a/include/libiberty.h /usr/include --> cp -v ../binutils-2.21.1/include/libiberty.h /usr/include -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page