Markku Pesonen tour...@gmail.com wrote
iproute2 doesn't even use the headers. See this commit in upstream:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git;a=commit;h=13603f6a9e46f08576f6284a0ef1ce1fbf94ffe0
Nice! I'll try a libnl-less build tonight with relevant seds to prevent
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention:
pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name
dash patchrev3.patch
That is, the name should be:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:07:42 -0600
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Be careful. There are a lot of packages that need libpng. At least
qt3, firefox, seamonkey, thunderbird, and gimp have patches for libpng-1.5.
Since it's only a point release, they are probably OK, but they should
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention:
pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name
dash patchrev3.patch
That is, the name should
Hi,
Thanks for a great book. I have just set up my first LFS; I had great
fun and all is fine.
I hit a couple of issues setting up Grub that, looking through the
lfs-support archive, have bitten a few others and wondered if it is
worth mentioning in the book.
I used SVN-20120106 and although
Bob Davison wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for a great book. I have just set up my first LFS; I had great
fun and all is fine.
I hit a couple of issues setting up Grub that, looking through the
lfs-support archive, have bitten a few others and wondered if it is
worth mentioning in the book.
I used
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 02:22 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
For those who saw me moaning on lfs-book about libnl-2.0 (for me,
NetworkManager doesn't build against it), a summary of what is going
to happen:
in LFS - nothing! Matt spotted that iproute2 only uses the
headers, it doesn't link
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:43:12PM +, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 02:22 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
For those who saw me moaning on lfs-book about libnl-2.0 (for me,
NetworkManager doesn't build against it), a summary of what is going
to happen:
in LFS - nothing! Matt
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention:
pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name
