Re: [lfs-dev] test on LFS 7.1-rc1: ICA + suggestion

2012-02-21 Thread Andrew Benton
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:47:00 +0100 Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > I have done a test of LFS-7.1-rc1. ICA went OK, except the > already reported problem with ld.so.cache (ldconfig still missing > somewhere), which is not a big issue. In case somebody else > does ICA, there is this difference in

Re: [lfs-dev] test on LFS 7.1-rc1: ICA + suggestion

2012-02-21 Thread Andrew Benton
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:47:00 +0100 Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > I have done a test of LFS-7.1-rc1. ICA went OK, except the > already reported problem with ld.so.cache (ldconfig still missing > somewhere), which is not a big issue. In case somebody else > does ICA, there is this difference in

[lfs-dev] test on LFS 7.1-rc1: ICA + suggestion

2012-02-21 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, I have done a test of LFS-7.1-rc1. ICA went OK, except the already reported problem with ld.so.cache (ldconfig still missing somewhere), which is not a big issue. In case somebody else does ICA, there is this difference in etip.h between ICA iterations 1 and 2: