Ncurses build fails in chapter 5, help

2006-03-30 Thread Fahrenheit
Hi all, i was doing the udev_update branch of the lfs book, and in chapter 5, in the install part of ncurses 5.5, i get an error, i don't get the cause, so if someone could help me, i would be thankful. this is the part that fails: make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/ncurses-5.5/misc' sh

Re: Ncurses build fails in chapter 5, help

2006-03-30 Thread Fahrenheit
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:06:42 +0100 Fahrenheit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've btw checked the run_tic.sh script and where it fails is here: if ( $SHLIB tic$suffix -x -s -o $TERMINFO $source ) then echo '** built new '$TERMINFO else echo '? tic could not build '$TERMINFO

Re: Ncurses build fails in chapter 5, help

2006-03-30 Thread Fahrenheit
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:22:09 -0800 Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your toolchain is not adjusted. See how it's looking for /lib/libc.so.6? It should be looking in /tools. actualy i did adjust the toolchain, twice: make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/ncurses-5.5/misc' make: ***

Re: Ncurses build fails in chapter 5, help

2006-03-30 Thread Fahrenheit
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:46:11 -0800 Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, then the toolchain adjustment didn't work because by the time you get to ncurses, it should not be trying to use your (incompatible) libc on your host. And I can't guess at what went wrong because I haven't used

gcc-4.1.0 specs patch

2006-03-29 Thread Fahrenheit
Hi all, i've updated the gcc specs patch to be useable with version 4.1.0 of gcc. as for as i can see it works ok. the file is here: http://pwp.netcabo.pt/fahrenheit/gcc-4.1.0.specs1.patch -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq

Re: Alphabetical Build Clean [Was Re: [Alphabetical] Build order, Bug 684, Issue with Bash patch]

2006-03-08 Thread Fahrenheit
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:10:58 -0800 Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/8/06, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think deps. that are needed for testsuites could be labeled as being optional (notice I already started doing that for a few packages) but you could do the same with

Perl sprintf patch missing from patch list

2006-01-21 Thread Fahrenheit
Hi all, the perl sprintf patch as of svn20060120, is missing from the patch list page, the only one there is the libc patch. Miguel -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page