- Mail original -
De: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
À: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Envoyé: Mardi 14 Mai 2013 20:59:08
Objet: [lfs-dev] util-linux issues
1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
remounting the root fs read
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
- Mail original -
De: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
À: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Envoyé: Mardi 14 Mai 2013 20:59:08
Objet: [lfs-dev] util-linux issues
1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount
- Mail original -
De: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
À: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 15 Mai 2013 20:16:58
Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] util-linux issues
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
- Mail original -
De: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du
1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
remounting the root fs read only with a 'umount -a -r' command.
I'm not sure if we should fix that in LFS or just wait until the next
release of util-linux. We do have a workaround in place in the mountfs
script, and it's a
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 13:59 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
remounting the root fs read only with a 'umount -a -r' command.
I'm not sure if we should fix that in LFS or just wait until the next
release of util-linux. We do have
2013/5/15 Matt Burgess matt...@linuxfromscratch.org:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 13:59 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
remounting the root fs read only with a 'umount -a -r' command.
I'm not sure if we should fix that in LFS or just wait
On 05/14/2013 01:59:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
2. Also, I did a test of setting /etc/mtab as a symlink to
/proc/mounts
and it seems to work properly although the output of 'mount' is a bit
more verbose. My objection of 'mount' not specifying the device for
the
rootfs is fixed. I think