Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Joe Ciccone wrote these words on 03/26/07 17:02 CST:
>
>> Why not both? Those who know their way around can look at the individual
>> indexes but there's always the long index for those who want it. Have
>> them link to eachother.
>>
>> Just my $0.02.
>
> Good thought. B
Joe Ciccone wrote these words on 03/26/07 17:02 CST:
> Why not both? Those who know their way around can look at the individual
> indexes but there's always the long index for those who want it. Have
> them link to eachother.
>
> Just my $0.02.
Good thought. But it is a helluva lot of work for
Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> I'm sitting on the fence here. On one hand, I like the idea of
> individual indexes for packages/libraries/programs/etc. because
> of the reduced sizes and faster loading times. But on the other
> hand I don't want to have to open up multiple indexes to find
> what I'm loo
Hi,
The generation of the Index is one of the most broken parts using the new
DocBook-XSL code. That meant that that higly customized stylesheets need be
full reworked.
Due that it need be reworked in any case, I would take advantage of a new
available feature: The possibility to create separa
