While it's not really prevalent just yet, big ISPs are supposed to begin
to doing test roll-outs of IPv6 by the end of the year (if they haven't
already). Probably good to add an entry for the loopback at very least.
It's just ::1 localhost immediately under the existing 127.0.0.1 entry.
I'm
On Sep 5, 2011, at 2:13 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
I'm not really sure what to do about actual IPv6 entries as your prefix
will likely change when your router is rebooted unless ISPs start
handing out static /64s (the last 64 bits are stable as they are
assembled from the MAC address with FFFE
DJ Lucas wrote:
While it's not really prevalent just yet, big ISPs are supposed to begin
to doing test roll-outs of IPv6 by the end of the year (if they haven't
already). Probably good to add an entry for the loopback at very least.
It's just ::1 localhost immediately under the existing
On 09/05/2011 12:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Does IPv6 run in conjunction with IPv4. I think it does. I don't
really understand all the issues with implementing IPv4.
I think that we should hold off for now (after LFS-7.0) until we get a
good handle on how it will be used. AFAIK, most
