Greg Schafer wrote:
Here it is folks, living proof CLFS are competing directly against their
parent project. I'm utterly gobsmacked..
Damn Greg, did they piss in your Cheerios or what? Just as you did, the
CLFS group did not like the goals, nor the direction that LFS was taking
and they
Rob Thornton wrote:
I look forward to seeing the community unite and make itself stronger!
xLFS has been an excellent source for me and anything that makes it
stronger makes life better for my next build!
Hi Rob,
I would love to see what you and Robert C. have suggested happen.
Especially
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hi Rob,
I would love to see what you and Robert C. have suggested happen.
[snip good stuff]
Anyway, as far as I am concerned, I would be glad to give up any commit
privileges I have in the projects and work only from the sidelines if it
would help remove the rift
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Greg Schafer gscha...@zip.com.au wrote:
I've seen some incredible stuff on the *LFS lists over the years but this
appears to be the most breathtaking act of arrogance I've ever witnessed.
Here it is folks, living proof CLFS are competing directly against their
I have poked my head in from time to time so some of you may have seen
my name once or twice. I have built LFS a few times now and must say it
has been one of the most rewarding tasks I've ever completed. I've
learned a great deal about Linux and continue to do so each time I build
LFS.
I
Author: jim
Log:
Creating of CLFS Native Structure
Well, well, well. What have we here? What happened to the big `C' in CLFS
guys? Changing your name to NLFS?
I've seen some incredible stuff on the *LFS lists over the years but this
appears to be the most breathtaking act of arrogance I've
Selon Greg Schafer gscha...@zip.com.au:
Author: jim
Log:
Creating of CLFS Native Structure
As a listener of (in alphabetical order) CLFS, DIY, HLFS, LFS , I am very
disappointed by the bad atmosphere between some authors and surprised from so
much resentment.
I understand some may prefer
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Greg Schafer gscha...@zip.com.au wrote:
If the LFS project had any kind of leadership with any kind of backbone,
there'd be serious consequences for this kind of divisive behavior.
While I agree with your sentiments about Cross LFS creating a native
book, what
LFS was sparked in the day of 32bit x86, and now 64bit is becoming popular,
and LFS is finding itself supporting multiple architectures. ALFS is trying
to make things easier with automation. HLFS has some add-ons. CLFS wants to
support Sparc, Macintosh, and other architectures, and I think
