Re: File reg_startend patch

2007-04-15 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Sunday 15 April 2007 10:29, M.Canales.es wrote: > El Sábado, 7 de Abril de 2007 18:57, Matthew Burgess escribió: > > Thanks Greg, I'll remove the patch some time this week. > > Matt, don't forget this one, there is no trac entry for it. Yep. thanks. It's in my working copy and I'll be kicking

Re: File reg_startend patch

2007-04-15 Thread M.Canales.es
El Sábado, 7 de Abril de 2007 18:57, Matthew Burgess escribió: > Thanks Greg, I'll remove the patch some time this week. > Matt, don't forget this one, there is no trac entry for it. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http

Re: File reg_startend patch

2007-04-07 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Saturday 07 April 2007 13:35, Greg Schafer wrote: > Umm, why are you applying this patch? Just because it appears on the ftp > site? Nope, I did actually take a look at the source code and erroneously concluded it was necessary as REG_STARTEND wasn't defined. Obviously, I forgot to take int

File reg_startend patch

2007-04-07 Thread Greg Schafer
> Author: matthew > Date: 2007-03-04 12:28:29 -0700 (Sun, 04 Mar 2007) > New Revision: 7956 > Upgrade to File-4.20. Fixes #1968. > +Apply a patch to fix a bug caused by an undefined constant: > + > +patch -Np1 -i > ../&file-reg_startend-patch; Umm, why