Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/13/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ftp://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/lfs-packages/&version;/shadow-&shadow-version;.tar.bz2 > http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/LFS/lfs-packages/&version;/shadow-&shadow-version;.tar.bz2 > > These will be symlinks to conglomeration and

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/13/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Randy McMurchy wrote: >>> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/13/07 12:32 CST: >>> http://cross-lfs.org/files/packages/svn/shadow-4.0.18.1.tar.bz2 >>> I put that there, and I now think it should be changed. If CLFS

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/13/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Randy McMurchy wrote: > > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/13/07 12:32 CST: > > > >> http://cross-lfs.org/files/packages/svn/shadow-4.0.18.1.tar.bz2 > > > > I put that there, and I now think it should be changed. If CLFS > > updates their ve

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Justin Robert Knierim
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > If we can't find the developer's canonical location, I'd really prefer > anduin where we have complete control. For shadow, it is already there. > Sounds good, the lfs package repo won't be having that file be removed for years, I still even have 6.0 packages in the rsync

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/13/07 13:02 CST: > >> Right, but where is that mirroring from? The canonical download >> address comes from the LFS book and is picked up in the anduin sources >> repo. You can't mirror yourself. > > Here's a link, but I'm not sure how

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/13/07 13:02 CST: > Right, but where is that mirroring from? The canonical download > address comes from the LFS book and is picked up in the anduin sources > repo. You can't mirror yourself. Here's a link, but I'm not sure how long it would be valid for. http

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/13/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Lunes, 13 de Agosto de 2007 19:32, Dan Nicholson escribió: > > > Yeah, that site is gone. In BLFS we're using this: > > > > http://cross-lfs.org/files/packages/svn/shadow-4.0.18.1.tar.bz2 > > > > There are plenty of places we can put it on on

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/13/07 12:32 CST: > >> http://cross-lfs.org/files/packages/svn/shadow-4.0.18.1.tar.bz2 > > I put that there, and I now think it should be changed. If CLFS > updates their version of Shadow, that link is likely to go away. > > I'll wait

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread M.Canales.es
El Lunes, 13 de Agosto de 2007 19:32, Dan Nicholson escribió: > Yeah, that site is gone. In BLFS we're using this: > > http://cross-lfs.org/files/packages/svn/shadow-4.0.18.1.tar.bz2 > > There are plenty of places we can put it on one of the LFS servers. > downloads.linuxfromscratch.org seems like

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/13/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/13/07 12:32 CST: > > > http://cross-lfs.org/files/packages/svn/shadow-4.0.18.1.tar.bz2 > > I put that there, and I now think it should be changed. If CLFS > updates their version of Shadow, that link is li

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/13/07 12:32 CST: > http://cross-lfs.org/files/packages/svn/shadow-4.0.18.1.tar.bz2 I put that there, and I now think it should be changed. If CLFS updates their version of Shadow, that link is likely to go away. I'll wait for Dan to fix LFS, and I'll just pu

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/13/07, Trent Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 12 August 2007 23:57, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Are there any last minute updates I need to make before sending the -rc2 > > release announcement? > > The changelog mentions the linux upgrade as 2.6.22.1 not 2.6.22.2. Good catch. I think t

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Trent Shea
On Sunday 12 August 2007 23:57, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Are there any last minute updates I need to make before sending the -rc2 > release announcement? The changelog mentions the linux upgrade as 2.6.22.1 not 2.6.22.2. Also, the shadow package links have never worked for me (two or three weeks of

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/12/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are there any last minute updates I need to make before sending the -rc2 >> release announcement? > > I just found something I'd like changed in the bootscripts. A while > back, I started removing 2>/dev/null redirection

Re: LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-13 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/12/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are there any last minute updates I need to make before sending the -rc2 > release announcement? I just found something I'd like changed in the bootscripts. A while back, I started removing 2>/dev/null redirection since it hides messages for e

LFS-6.3-rc2 has been generated

2007-08-12 Thread Bruce Dubbs
The web site has been updated too, but the release announcement has not yet been sent. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.3-rc2/ The only outstanding issue before 6.3 final that I know about is to finish getting the acknowledgments page updated properly. Are there any last minute updat