Re: gcc make check

2007-07-26 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:01:27PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote: > > On the Pentium-IV machin I have no current testsuites logs right now. On the > AMD64 machine I have the logs for a normal build, a 3-iterations build and a > build using MAKEFLAGS=-j3. On all of them the results are identical: >

Re: gcc make check

2007-07-26 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 26 de Julio de 2007 18:28, Dan Nicholson escribió: > IIRC, the last time I ran the 4.1.2 testsuite, I also had no failures. > That wasn't during a bootstrap, though. Oh, I don't remember what > happened with mudflap. Manuel, do you still have the test logs from > the LFS jhalfs run you

Re: gcc make check

2007-07-26 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/25/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was investigating the gcc-4.1.2 build and got the output below. What > was surprising to me is that there were no unexpected failures. > > Should the comments in the book about expecting some failures be changed? IIRC, the last time I ran the

Re: gcc make check

2007-07-26 Thread Luca
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Dubbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:31 AM Subject: gcc make check >I was investigating the gcc-4.1.2 build and got the output below. What > was surprising to me is that there were no unexpected fa