On 7/24/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd personally rather use the new version
> > since it syncs to the 2.6.22 interfaces and that's the kernel we'll be
> > running. I'll try poking the maintainer again.
>
> Thanks Dan. Maybe keeping the package freeze open for IPRoute2 &
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:09:18 -0700, "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You may want to wait for Matthew's comments since I think he has been
> testing the new version.
My testing of a repackaged version was limited to ensuring that the build
didn't break and that I could ping a remote
On 7/23/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
> > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/23/07 22:06 CST:
> >
> >> The other, iproute2-2.6.22-070710, is something we need to discuss. The
> >> problem is with the packaging. The package expands to the current
> >> director
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/23/07 22:06 CST:
>
>> The other, iproute2-2.6.22-070710, is something we need to discuss. The
>> problem is with the packaging. The package expands to the current
>> directory. The issue is what to do. Here is what I see as the option
