Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2019, 04:09 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat via lfs-
dev:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:59:04PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I was looking through my logs to identify which packages do not use
> > my CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS (thinking about trying LTO at some point) and
> > reading the
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:31:08AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
>
> I've reported this (several months ago):
>
> https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=133490
>
> And they've fixed it in dev branch. They just didn't backport this into
> 5.28.x.
Thanks. I've just a few minutes
On 2019-04-23 04:09 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:59:04PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I was looking through my logs to identify which packages do not use
> > my CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS (thinking about trying LTO at some point) and
> > reading the voluminous output
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:59:04PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I was looking through my logs to identify which packages do not use
> my CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS (thinking about trying LTO at some point) and
> reading the voluminous output from perl's Configure I noticed:
>
> Guessing which symbols your C
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:46 AM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> On 22/04/2019 05:55, Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 8:37 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >>
> >>> I wasn't asking because of any personal preference. I just noticed
> >>> that out of the box Ubuntu
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:22 AM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
wrote:
>
> On 22/04/2019 05:55, Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 8:37 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >>
> >>> I wasn't asking because of any personal preference. I just noticed
> >>> that out of the box Ubuntu
On 4/21/19 10:55 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 8:37 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I wasn't asking because of any personal preference. I just noticed
that out of the box Ubuntu fails this test because /bin/sh is a
symlink to /bin/dash, and I was wondering if this is truly a hard
On 22/04/2019 02:28, Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 8:17 PM Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/21/19 7:04 PM, Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What's the thinking behind the line in section 2.2 that requires
>>> /bin/sh to be a symlink or a
On 22/04/2019 05:55, Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 8:37 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> I wasn't asking because of any personal preference. I just noticed
>>> that out of the box Ubuntu fails this test because /bin/sh is a
>>> symlink to /bin/dash, and I was wondering
