Hi.
I'm trying to build a mini-LFS, and wanted to know if I can get rid of
all files installed by module-init-tools, since I haven't enabled module
loading support in the kernel.
The files installed by module-init-tools-3.1 are the following:
(~): paco -fz module-init-tools-3.1
/bin/lsmod
/
David Rosal wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to build a mini-LFS, and wanted to know if I can get rid of
all files installed by module-init-tools, since I haven't enabled module
loading support in the kernel.
No definite answer I'm afraid. My suspicion is that it should be fine.
Although I don't us
Hi again.
Continuing to reduce the size of my LFS, I've found a quite strange
thing: it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with different
names instead of simply symlink them. For example:
(~): diff --report-identical-files /usr/man/man8/fsck.ext{2,3}.8.bz2
Files /usr/man/man8/fsck
On 7/29/05, David Rosal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> Continuing to reduce the size of my LFS, I've found a quite strange
> thing: it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with different
> names instead of simply symlink them.
>
Are you sure they are not hardlinks?
--
Tush
David Rosal wrote:
it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with different
names instead of simply symlink them.
Is there any technical reason to make thinks like this?
Can I replace one of each couple of identical files by a symlink?
Some programs act differently dependent on how th
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
On 7/29/05, David Rosal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again.
Continuing to reduce the size of my LFS, I've found a quite strange
thing: it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with different
names instead of simply symlink them.
Are you sure they are not ha
David Rosal wrote:
Hi again.
Continuing to reduce the size of my LFS, I've found a quite strange
thing: it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with different
names instead of simply symlink them. For example:
I was sent to newbie corner last week! :-)
These are already hard links
On 7/29/05, David Rosal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > On 7/29/05, David Rosal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi again.
> >>
> >>Continuing to reduce the size of my LFS, I've found a quite strange
> >>thing: it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with differe
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
http://www.telenovela-world.com/~spade/linux/lg/105/pitcher.html
Probably this should be added to the faq entry mentioned by David J?
Sounds like a good idea to me. Added to the faq in r519 (www2).
--
Justin R. Knierim
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
http://www.telenovela-world.com/~spade/linux/lg/105/pitcher.html
Probably this should be added to the faq entry mentioned by David J?
Yes , that has a good explanation, it should be linked. imho
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-su
David Rosal wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to build a mini-LFS, and wanted to know if I can get rid of
all files installed by module-init-tools, since I haven't enabled module
loading support in the kernel.
I don't build any modules so I don't install module-init-tools. Works for me.
--
http://linux
David Jensen wrote:
> David Rosal wrote:
>
>> Hi again.
>>
>> Continuing to reduce the size of my LFS, I've found a quite strange
>> thing: it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with different
>> names instead of simply symlink them. For example:
>
>
> I was sent to newbie corner last
Hi,
I'm installing a LFS system, by the release 6.1 of the book. I'm encountering a
problem. I did, as said the book:
Then:
make
Here's the message I get at the end:
Here's the message I get at the end:
/mnt/sources/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux.so
.2 --library-path
/mnt/sources/glibc-build:/mnt/s
root wrote:
So, I use knoppix, which has a kernel
2.4.22-xfs.
Please re-read
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.1/prologue/hostreqs.html.
Recent versions of knoppix come with a 2.6 kernel which can be booted
into using a boot parameter.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinf
When building either LFS-6.1 or LFS-development, the testsuite for tar
(both in chapter 5 and chapter 6) bombs as follows:
---
## -- ##
## GNU tar 1.15.1 test suite. ##
## -- ##
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
> I have been lucky enough to have everything to do with local
> characters "just work" for many a year... But now I find myself
> having to look into this "locale-thing".
>
> My emacs will display special Norwegian characters in X for older
> files. B
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Matt Bartley wrote:
> When building either LFS-6.1 or LFS-development, the testsuite for tar
> (both in chapter 5 and chapter 6) bombs as follows:
>
> 20: working --listed FAILED (listed02.at:148)
>
> ERROR: 30 tests were run,
> 1 failed unexpect
Can anyone share some hints of the process of building LFS using the
Live CD?
It seems to me that if you have booted an "empty" system (i.e empty
hard drive) with the LFS CD, then you can entirely skip chapter 5
(the temporary system) and go straight to chapter 6. Is this right?
- Joe
--
h
Joseph M Dupre (AVAB Inc.) wrote:
Can anyone share some hints of the process of building LFS using the
Live CD?
It seems to me that if you have booted an "empty" system (i.e empty
hard drive) with the LFS CD, then you can entirely skip chapter 5
(the temporary system) and go straight to chapt
Joe,
It's not so clear that whether you want to make a Live CD,
or You already have LiveCD and now you are facing some kind of problem.
It would be better to state clear uyour problem.
Regards
sunsom
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph M Dupre (AVAB Inc.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent:
Compiling Xorg with GCC4 apparently results in a messed-up video driver
for certain hardware (like mine, for example). It seems "libvgahw.a" has
a problem that causes all the other consoles on my system to go blank
when X starts. I see that there is a fix for it - I keep seeing
referencs to "03
21 matches
Mail list logo
