Re: Psmisc-22.10 broken symlink

2010-03-29 Thread Philippe Delavalade
Le mardi 30 mars à 07:05, Rick Shelton a écrit : > > I think I found a little problem with the instructions in the book here. > > LFS 6.6 > Ch 6.52. Psmisc-22.10 > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > make > make install > ln -sv killall /bin/pidof > > root:/sources/psmisc-22.10# ln -sv killall /bi

Psmisc-22.10 broken symlink

2010-03-29 Thread Rick Shelton
I think I found a little problem with the instructions in the book here. LFS 6.6 Ch 6.52. Psmisc-22.10 ./configure --prefix=/usr make make install ln -sv killall /bin/pidof root:/sources/psmisc-22.10# ln -sv killall /bin/pidof `/bin/pidof' -> `killall' root:/sources/psmisc-22.10# ls -l /bin/kil

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

2010-03-29 Thread x2164
- Original Message - From: Bruce Dubbs To: LFS Support List Sent: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:25:37 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around. x2...@lycos.com wrote: > Hi, > > This is the work around i'm using. > . . . > >

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

2010-03-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
x2...@lycos.com wrote: > Hi, > > This is the work around i'm using. > > I don't know if it will help on x86_64. > > Assuming your compilation stopped at the line 'linking' > object files to produce 'nscd': > > Paste up the 'linking' line that failed but >

Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

2010-03-29 Thread x2164
Hi, This is the work around i'm using. I don't know if it will help on x86_64. Assuming your compilation stopped at the line 'linking' object files to produce 'nscd': Paste up the 'linking' line that failed but include -lssp as an option. I'll add

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc compile stopped with `__stack_chk_guard'

2010-03-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Szabolcs Gyalókay wrote: > Hi All, > > >> I've reached LFS Bk6.6 Ch6.9 "Glibc-2.11.1". >> >> I've followed the book pretty much to the letter. >> >> When trying to compile Glibc-2.11.1, compilation stopped >> at the link line outputting 'nscd'. >> 'make' was in the glibc-build

Book Comprehensibility

2010-03-29 Thread Mike McCarty
I've read the first few sections of Chapter 5 of the rev 6.6 book, and then the section concerning the build of GCC, section 5.5. I see no way to make this particular portion of the book more clear. Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} Oppose globalization an

Re: Errors when running glibc-2.11-1 tests in section 6.9.

2010-03-29 Thread Mike McCarty
jumbophut wrote: > I have a significant number of errors when testing the build of > glibc-2.11.1 in section 6.9 of the book. > > I would be grateful if people could advise whether these are a problem > before I go on. > > Output of 'grep Error glibc-check-log': [...] > Worryingly, I did the bu

Book Comprehensibility WAS Unable to compile GCC

2010-03-29 Thread Mike McCarty
Simon Geard wrote: > Well, if we're seeing people being confused by what 'source directory' > refers to in this case, it's probably worth trying to clarify it a > little. Even a single-word change like the following might help: > > "The GCC documentation recommends building GCC outside > o

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc compile stopped with `__stack_chk_guard'

2010-03-29 Thread Szabolcs Gyalókay
Hi All, > I've reached LFS Bk6.6 Ch6.9 "Glibc-2.11.1". > > I've followed the book pretty much to the letter. > > When trying to compile Glibc-2.11.1, compilation stopped > at the link line outputting 'nscd'. > 'make' was in the glibc-build/nscd directory. > The error was:

Re: Errors when running glibc-2.11-1 tests in section 6.9.

2010-03-29 Thread jumbophut
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Chris Staub wrote: > On 03/28/2010 02:00 AM, jumbophut wrote: >> I have a significant number of errors when testing the build of >> glibc-2.11.1 in section 6.9 of the book. >> >> >> /sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-cancel24: error while loading shared >> libraries: li

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-29 Thread Simon Geard
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 11:04 +0100, Philippe Delavalade wrote: > Yes but maybe people don't read carefully parts where general assumptions > are done. I guess that they only take care to command lines. True, but that's a separate problem. If text if unclear, we can make the text clearer. But if peo

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-29 Thread Simon Geard
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 16:59 -0400, stosss wrote: > The way you tell the poster they did something wrong sparks confrontation. Speaking of which... :( > My vote goes to Simon and Ken for being the most cool headed AND > helpful long timers on these lists. Much appreciated. Simon. signature.asc