Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

2012-01-03 Thread jasonpsage
>Doing the building two or three times can only help me understand things >better. Agreed >Anyway I wonder if anybody ever did the build right the first time, in only a >single go? I Did... But then when it booted it yelled at me in black, white and in COLOR [FAIL] [FAIL] LOL Now I'm aut

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

2012-01-03 Thread mais lfs
@Jason: that's my approach as well, just roll with the blows... (and go play GTA when I take a break - now _that's_ a lol!) I've reached install of glibc again, this time the grep error-check is: root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-re

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

2012-01-03 Thread mais lfs
Just a final check, I get the following result: root:/sources/glibc-build# grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g' SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64") SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib") SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib") SEARCH_DIR("/lib"); Is the *-unknown-* to be e

Re: [lfs-support] Cannot open root device "sda1"

2012-01-03 Thread Simon Geard
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 08:42 -0800, brown wrap wrote: > Actually, I answered my own question, I changed fstab to hda and that > allowed it to boot. I don't quite understand it, since I thought hda > was for scsi and this is an ols laptop which uses IDE. Other way around. Traditionally, 'hd' was fo

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

2012-01-03 Thread jasonpsage
>root:/sources/glibc-build# grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g' >SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64") >SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib") >SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib") >SEARCH_DIR("/lib"); > >Is the *-unknown-* to be expected? I think that has to do with the

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

2012-01-03 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 1/3/2012 5:24 AM, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote: >> root:/sources/glibc-build# grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g' >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64") >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib") >> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib") >> SEARCH_DIR("/lib"); >> >> Is the

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

2012-01-03 Thread Andrew Benton
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:19:39 -0600 Eleanore Boyd wrote: > It should say "x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu", no unknown factor. Something is > very wrong with associations, hostnames, or otherwise. No, that's not true. After the second pass of gcc in chapter 5 it says x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (or on 32 bit

[lfs-support] LFS - coreutils-8.14 missing gmp.h - Compilation TERMINATED... sniff.... Waaaah

2012-01-03 Thread jasonpsage
Has anyone received an error with core utils resembling: make[3]: Entering Directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/coreutils-8.14/src' CC expr.o expr.c:54:18 fatal error: gmp.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. Is there perhaps a dependancy not in the list of files we are to downloa

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.0 - broken bash build - command substitution: syntax error near unexpected token `)'

2012-01-03 Thread Tom Blamer
Thank you for this hint. I am using LFS 7.0 on an Xubuntu Lucid 32bit on an old > Pentium 4 -> x686. I followed the instructions of the book exactly. But the > build of bash in chapter 5 failed because there was no yacc. So I installed > byacc from ubuntu packages. After that Bash built and as rec

[lfs-support] date timezone "issue" during portion of build

2012-01-03 Thread David Gay
(I thought I sent this email a few days ago, but I don't see it on the list - so I hope this isn't a redundant post. Anyway...) I don't know if this is an actual issue, or if it's simply an expected by-product of the build process, but it's bugging the heck out of me not knowing! During part

Re: [lfs-support] date timezone "issue" during portion of build

2012-01-03 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 12:30:12PM -0800, David Gay wrote: > (I thought I sent this email a few days ago, but I don't see it on the list - > so I hope this isn't a redundant post. Anyway...) > I haven't seen it. > > I don't know if this is an actual issue, or if it's simply an expected > by-pr

[lfs-support] Nobody has received the fatal error missing gmp.h in coreutils-8.14

2012-01-03 Thread jasonpsage
I posted earlier, and I don't expect speedy response but I was hoping someone would say yay or Nay. compiling: coreutils-8.14 I get: expr.c:54:18 fatal error : gmp.h: no such file or directory Sounds kind of serious to me... has anyone see this before? Or is it me, my linux host or something?

Re: [lfs-support] Nobody has received the fatal error missing gmp.h in coreutils-8.14

2012-01-03 Thread Matijn Woudt
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:28 AM, wrote: > > I posted earlier, and I don't expect speedy response but I was hoping > someone would say yay or Nay. > > compiling: coreutils-8.14 I get: > > expr.c:54:18 fatal error : gmp.h: no such file or directory > > > Sounds kind of serious to me... has anyone s

Re: [lfs-support] Nobody has received the fatal error missing gmp.h in coreutils-8.14

2012-01-03 Thread Baho Utot
On 01/03/2012 06:28 PM, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote: > I posted earlier, and I don't expect speedy response but I was hoping > someone would say yay or Nay. > > compiling: coreutils-8.14 I get: > > expr.c:54:18 fatal error : gmp.h: no such file or directory > > > Sounds kind of serious to me... has

Re: [lfs-support] Nobody has received the fatal error missing gmp.h in coreutils-8.14

2012-01-03 Thread Rick Shelton
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Matijn Woudt wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:28 AM,   wrote: >> >> I posted earlier, and I don't expect speedy response but I was hoping >> someone would say yay or Nay. >> >> compiling: coreutils-8.14 I get: >> >> expr.c:54:18 fatal error : gmp.h: no such file o

Re: [lfs-support] date timezone "issue" during portion of build

2012-01-03 Thread David Gay
>>On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 12:30:12PM -0800, David Gay wrote: >>Subject: date timezone "issue" during portion of build > >> During part of the build, after coreutils is installed in section 5.18, >> until coreutils is installed in section 6.23, the date command will only >> return a UTC time.  ie: >