Lázaro Morales wrote:
En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0301@gmail.**
com ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com escribió:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:13:11 +0100
ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com wrote:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
Fix this. You can't do LFS with
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:29:04 +0100
Lázaro Morales laz...@frioclima.com.cu wrote:
En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com
escribió:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:12:08 +0100
Eleanore Boyd cara...@cox.net wrote:
On 3/29/2012 11:03 AM, mike wrote:
hi,
I am blind and build my lfs's usually using grml and an ssh session but was
wondering if their is a way to get the lfs live cd to start with speakup for
building?
I am
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:29:58 +0100
mike msto...@jmshosting.us wrote:
hi ,
i go to the following link and wget the file and it claims it can't any
ideas?
http://launchpad.net/intltool/trunk/0.50.0/+download/intltool-0.50.0.tar.gz
Works for me:
andy@eccles:~$ wget
On 3/30/2012 8:02 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:29:04 +0100
Lázaro Moraleslaz...@frioclima.com.cu wrote:
En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarmaankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com
escribió:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
On 3/30/2012 8:15 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:12:08 +0100
Eleanore Boydcara...@cox.net wrote:
On 3/29/2012 11:03 AM, mike wrote:
hi,
I am blind and build my lfs's usually using grml and an ssh session but was
wondering if their is a way to get the lfs live cd to start
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:27:34PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:05:47PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
In my case (also with separate /boot partitions) I have a
directory 'boot' on the boot partition (i.e. /boot/boot when
everything is mounted)
Ken Moffat wrote:
Update - I did an install on a new machine today, using LFS-7.1 with
a separate /boot partition, and after building/installing grub-1.99
it did NOT need the symlink, so I guess it really was a grub-1.97
bug.
I didn't need it for 1.97. I think it more likely that you had
