Re: [lfs-support] LFS-SVN ext4 partition

2013-05-19 Thread Markku Pesonen
Baho Utot wrote: > I have always in the past used a ext3 partition on my LFS systems. I > have changed to ext4 and on boot I get errors that are saying than it > had problems mounting the partition due to unsupported options, it has > EXT3-fs in the first two error messages, the third message s

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-SVN ext4 partition

2013-05-19 Thread Baho Utot
On 5/19/2013 9:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 05:22:45PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote: >>> I have always in the past used a ext3 partition on my LFS systems. I >>> have changed to ext4 and on boot I get errors that are saying than it >>> had problems mounting the

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-SVN ext4 partition

2013-05-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 05:22:45PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote: >> I have always in the past used a ext3 partition on my LFS systems. I >> have changed to ext4 and on boot I get errors that are saying than it >> had problems mounting the partition due to unsupported options, it has

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-SVN ext4 partition

2013-05-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 05:22:45PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote: > I have always in the past used a ext3 partition on my LFS systems. I > have changed to ext4 and on boot I get errors that are saying than it > had problems mounting the partition due to unsupported options, it has > EXT3-fs in the fir

[lfs-support] LFS-SVN ext4 partition

2013-05-19 Thread Baho Utot
I have always in the past used a ext3 partition on my LFS systems. I have changed to ext4 and on boot I get errors that are saying than it had problems mounting the partition due to unsupported options, it has EXT3-fs in the first two error messages, the third message says it uses EXT4-fs and

Re: [lfs-support] Q: re. LFS 7.3 errata

2013-05-19 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 19/05/2013 15:31, Jeremy Henty a écrit : > Sorry, I am confused. Do you mean I will be OK ignoring the erratum > or I will be OK if I follow it? And does "add --with-sysroot" mean > literally to add "--with-sysroot" rather than "--with-sysroot=$LFS" > (as in pass 1). It is "--with-sy

Re: [lfs-support] Q: re. LFS 7.3 errata

2013-05-19 Thread William Harrington
On May 19, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Jeremy Henty wrote: Sorry, I am confused. Do you mean I will be OK ignoring the erratum or I will be OK if I follow it? With your host you will be okay if you follow it or not. If you are using a newer multiarch host, you most likely will not be okay. Br

Re: [lfs-support] Q: re. LFS 7.3 errata

2013-05-19 Thread Jeremy Henty
William Harrington wrote: > > On May 15, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > > >Quote: > > > > Changes to some distros cause the build of check-0.9.9 to fail in > > Chapter 5. The proper fix is to add --with-sysroot to the end of > > the configure line in Binutils-2.23.1 - Pass 2