I am trying to build a 64-bit lfs-7.4 system using a host system based
on Slackware-14. Currently I am having a problem with the first pass of
building gcc. During the internal build of libmpc, a search is made for
/usr/lib64/libgmp.la. It is not found, so the build crashes.
libtool: link: ar
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:16:53 -0500
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Hazel Russman wrote:
> > I am trying to build a 64-bit lfs-7.4 system using a host system
> > based on Slackware-14. Currently I am having a problem with the
> > first pass of building gcc. During the internal build of
My Chapter 6 glibc check gave four errors. Three of them
(getaddrinfo4, annexc and run-conformtest) are expected but
the fourth in globtest is not mentioned in the book. Here is the
immediate context:
/bin/sh globtest.sh /sources/glibc-build/
' /sources/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
--libra
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:01:38 + (UTC)
Thomas Kupper wrote:
> G'day,
>
> I was coming across that error while trying to cross compile mpc for
> later use with gcc using Optware building system (nothing to do with
> LFS I agree). In my case it was mpc which did complain but mpfr was
> the one ca
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:57:14 +
lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:40:23 +
> > From: Hazel Russman
> > To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> >
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:08:56 +
lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
> Sanity-checks:
> ---
> * your host-os (Slackware 14.0) is 64-bit (what does 'uname -a' show)?
x86_64 as expected.
> * _prior_ to your creation of the symlink that you note below, did
> '/usr/lib64/libgmp.la' exist in th
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:05:51 +
lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
> > Just to check: did you use underscores there - i.e. in the above
> > --with_gmp_include=$(pwd)/gmp and --with_gmp_lib=$(pwd)/gmp/.libs
> > ; or did you use hyphens/dashes thus:
> > --with-gmp-include=$(pwd)/gmp --with-
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 14:13:49 -0600
William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Hazel Russman wrote:
>
> > On a full Slackware install, no one would notice this. Who is going
> > to root around in archive files looking for bad dependency paths
> > when e
On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 13:48:41 +
lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
> Hmmm. Three slightly-indirect observations (hopefully not too
> off-topic ;) ): --
> * can you post the output, please, of each of:
> $ ls -latrF /usr/lib64/lib{gmp,mpc,mpfr}*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 77656 Feb 8 2011 /u
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:13:08 +
lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
> Should also have double-checked the following related info. Does your
> host-os look the same as these - no need to post if yes to all:
> $ ls -latrF /usr/lib64/libmp.*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 275184 May 27 2012 /usr/lib64
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:11:29 +
lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
> Hazel,
>
>
> I gather that you've sent a reply - in which you substantially or
> completely solve the issue - that hasn't reached the list yet since
> the weekend: it might be the attachment that's causing the trouble;
> c
I am building a 7.5 LFS with systemd and currently working through
chapter 6. Having successfully installed coreutils, I rebuilt acl and
ran the test suite. Initially I got 47 errors!
According to BLFS, the acl test suite requires a daemon user who is also
in the bin group (currently section 6.6 o
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:32:49 +0200
"Armin K." wrote:
> Drop the "root-tests", they are broken anyways. I couldn't even get
> them to run with daemon user present.
>
I didn't do the root tests. These were the standard ones invoked with
"make tests" though of course I was logged in as root when I
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:25:10 +0200
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Looking more closely at your log, it seems that acl's are enabled,
> because the line beginning with [95]: 'getfacl --omit-header f'
> correctly returns acl entries: user::rw-
> user:bin:rw-
> user:daemon:r--
> Actually, the line beginn
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:14:31 +0100
Ken Moffat wrote:
> From memory (so, I might be wrong) the book doesn't ever create a
> 'users' group in LFS...
>
> So, I _guess_ that the 'users' group exists on your host system and
> you will need to create it in LFS to get these tests to work.
>
> ĸen
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:42:58 +0200
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> It seems that the "bin" group membership
> of the "daemon" user is not needed. Could you confirm?
Confirmed. It is also not necessary to set real home directories or
shells for the bin and daemon users as specified in BLFS. /dev/null
an
16 matches
Mail list logo
