Michael wrote:
Today, I finished the LFS book, and booted into my first linux install that I
compiled myself!
Since I want to go deeper, and make it a full pledged desktop environment, I
headed over to the BLFS book. I know it sounds like I'm on the wrong mailing
list, but stick with me.
Michael Kearns wrote:
Hi,
Having decided to have another go at LFS (been through the process a
couple of times before, a few years back), I grabbed the 6.3 (amd64)
LiveCD, and followed the latest development book.
It's usually recommended to use CLFS for building 64 bit right now.
Michael Kearns wrote:
J. Greenlees wrote:
Michael Kearns wrote:
Hi,
Having decided to have another go at LFS (been through the process a
couple of times before, a few years back), I grabbed the 6.3 (amd64)
LiveCD, and followed the latest development book
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:44 AM, J. Greenlees
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
errors with yacc, command not found
error 127
so the question:
Bison or BYacc? which one to install and link to yacc?
You want bison. It installs a yacc binary.
I figured
nick wrote:
After finally figuring out I needed to install BISON because it wasn't
installed with PC Linux OS I get an error with /make install/ in CH 5.14
Bash-3.2.
The following is the output:
~snip~
make: [install] Error 2 (ignored)
The last word on that line is the
I decided to check PCLinuxOS as a build environment, which has been fine
until installing bash in chapter 5. [ even running the test on tcl
generated zero errors ]
errors with yacc, command not found
error 127
so the question:
Bison or BYacc? which one to install and link to yacc?
or, is it not
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
~snip~
I could let this thread continue for some more time, but I get the
impression that the ratio of votes will continue approximately the same.
as with the last time this subject came up :)
seems that while majority like the livecd project, getting more support
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Besides, the LFS LiveCD has no real technical benefits as a host, except that
it
is preconfigured and already contains the packages - but why not download
them
separately in a town with a broadband connection, put onto a flash drive, and
use with your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yup, 18 hours and counting for 'make bootstrap' of gcc 4.1.2
host is lfs livecd r2032
target:
Dell inspiron 3000, a pentium-mmx @266 MHz (i586-linux-gnu)
ram 128 MB ( system reports 144 MB from onboard cache ram for bios and
video )
swap space is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baho Utot wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2007 2:59 am, J. Greenlees wrote:
Yup, 18 hours and counting for 'make bootstrap' of gcc 4.1.2
host is lfs livecd r2032
target:
Dell inspiron 3000, a pentium-mmx @266 MHz (i586-linux-gnu)
ram 128 MB ( system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
J. Greenlees wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2007 2:59 am, J. Greenlees wrote:
Yup, 18 hours and counting for 'make bootstrap' of gcc 4.1.2
host is lfs livecd r2032
target:
Dell inspiron 3000, a pentium-mmx @266 MHz (i586-linux-gnu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
TheOldFellow wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:38:01 -0700
J. Greenlees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
on a major positive note, the lfs livecd is the only current distro to
actually run correctly on this ancient beast. knoppix and gnoppix both
won't
Lai Zit Seng wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Ben Cools wrote:
I've read a lot about LFS by now and I am very enthusiastic about it.
I am willing to try making my own distribution, but I still have one
question left:
Will I be capable, at the end of the learning process, to make my
system auto
13 matches
Mail list logo
