functions library and did not see anything jump out at me.
>
> Thanks
>
not sure..
first is you probably should post this on
blfs or something(so people don't bi*ch
and complain), but as for different user
tough to say I would test/try setting the user as root
maybe or some
On 02/03/10 23:33, xsystem wrote:
> I cant not Access http://www.torproject.org/ and I cant not Access
> facebook and even more . if i can Access http://www.torproject.org/ ，I
> wiil do not send this email .
>
I rest my case..
bottoms up people lifes too short for this crap
by
On 02/03/10 23:16, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> yeah!! your right..
>
> http://www.wikihow.com/Use-You're-and-Your
well I'm not here to have a pissing contest, nor bagg on people
nor be bagged on..
>
>> I figured clfs would be more suita
On 02/03/10 22:33, xsystem wrote:
> I can not download tor .
> You can to me via gmail.
> The best is the latest version of Official.
> Thank you very much !!!
sure you can:
http://www.torproject.org/
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-suppo
On 02/03/10 22:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> On 02/03/10 20:25, brown wrap wrote:
>>> Yesterday I thought I had made it through pass one. That was probably
>>> because any of the compiles I made didn't require the tests being run.
>>>
On 02/03/10 22:03, xsystem wrote:
> Who can give me a tor . Thanks !!!
>
well tor would be later down the line
i.g. probably in blfs.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
ould have done
so by just making sure the CFLAGS are set correctly
(as well as all other relevant cross compiling switches).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
rror: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
> See `config.log' for more details.
> make[1]: *** [configure-target-libgcc] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/6.6/gcc-build'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>
if your wanting to build an x8
y) compile individually and when getting to gcc use the
--with-gmp/mpfr* switches.
hope this helps
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
;FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
>>Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
>
>
> --------
> 网易邮箱，没有垃圾邮件的免费电子邮箱！ <http://yeah.net/?from=b1>
>
so if you built a system using a host cd
without(libselinux.so) -lselinux
you probably would of been fine. but if building
with ubuntu/fedora /lib/libselinux.so is there causing
coreutils to enable all support for SELinux
(but could be wrong);
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 01/27/10 14:23, linux fan wrote:
> On 1/27/10, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> Oops..
>> I didn't really follow the book step by step.
>
> The best results are by following the book instructions. Especially in
> chapter 6 those first steps must be done correctly:
>
On 01/27/10 13:27, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On 27/01/10 19:13, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> does your home directory have the proper permissions?
>> i.g. chown name:name /home/name
>>
>
> In LFS we compile in $LFS/sources which should have been chown lfs when
> you creat
://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/stable/
> Packages downloaded from wget list
> LiveCD lfslivecd-x86_64-6.3-r2160
>
> --
> Dmitry
>
does your home directory have the proper permissions?
i.g. chown name:name /home/name
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscrat
bselinux,libsepol,libsemamane(dev's) this way the header
files are there coreutils builds with SELinux support, but you'll just
never really use it(but if you decide the option is there).
hope this helps
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-suppor
an SELinux
header file. do you have an updated
libselinux?(or maybe build disabling audit/SELinux)
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ERNEL=="eth*",
>> NAME="eth0"
>>
>> -- Bruce
>> --
>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
>> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
>> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> Since udev isn't critical to booting a kernel, I suppose
> I can keep soldiering forward, but I'd prefer to follow the letter of
> the Book ...
>
> -j
you should be fine.
over here I think I was hitting
some odd quirk(but could be wrong),
i.g. two iMac's both the same system yet one
gave a long pause during boot(you gots me!!)
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 01/07/10 17:03, jmsc...@setex.ipcallback.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:30:13PM -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> On 01/07/10 16:07, jmsc...@setex.ipcallback.com wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm having a problem with configuring the network script
at rule might already be there
i.g. under /lib/udev/rules.d/*
also check in the source code
for this.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
you can use a livecd, just remember
that some packages will max out
your memory because they expand.
as for patch, sure. doo this
all the time on livecd's
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
t; ignoring nonexistent directory
> "/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/include"
> --
> Sean Porterfield
you don't have
ld installed(or have it in another location)
I think it's binutils that provides that.
(just look at the bottom of the
s a major function loss.
>
I usually do grub-setup
on the main partition /dev/sda
then on the os partition /dev/sda*
(still uncertain which it should be though).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
k `/dev/sda' error.
>
> -- Bruce
>
Thanks for these commands..
I was using
grub-install /dev/sda* --force
grub-setup /dev/sda --force
grub-setup /dev/sda* --force
grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
(above generates a lot of complaints from grub2,
I'll give your procedure a try).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ackages which deal with networking as iana, inetutils or
> iproute ?
>
> Thanks for help and advices.
>
> --
> Ph. Delavalade
>
>
you can install those without internet.
just download everything, or use the livCD that
has all the packages on it.
Justin P. Mattock
--
htt
tp://frontalnoize.blogspot.com -
> http://www.myspace.com/frontalnoizedistribution
I hit something like this similar. ended up
(in my case) being the dynamic linker i.g.
lib64 -> lib
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
e message you have something with NFS, wondering if
you might have something mixed up with the filesystem!!
any other ideas from other people as well?
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
your looking at
during boot that's failing?
(take a pic, post it to some public site(flikr)or
manually write it down).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
b /lib64 gcc needs to be told to point
in that direction(there should be a patch in the clfs tutorial).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
. Currently logged in as the LFS
> user that I created with the custom bash profile for LFS and
> everything else the book told me to do, I am pretty sure I had no
> typos in the configuration.
>
> Attached is my config.log for GCC.
>
> Thanks in advanced to anyone who helps!
Geoff Howell wrote:
> >> Fairly certain I didn't, I followed the book religously (copy/paste
> >> instructions).
> >> I will of course check tonight.
> >
> >I guess a good way of checking is the install verbosity.
> >
> >Justin P. Mattock
those
> > libs in the same location of the host instead of
> > /tool.(DESTDIR=* is how define the destination
> > of where you want your new build installed, keep in mind
> > libc use install_root=).
> > I did follow the book, but then again was so anxious to get
&
tination
of where you want your new build installed, keep in mind
libc use install_root=).
I did follow the book, but then again was so anxious to get
the thing booted I skipped parts here and there.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
supposed to be in /tools,
> but...is there a specific reason you're asking? Are you getting errors?
>
are you sure you didn't install libop* unto your host system i.g.
DESTDIR=/some/location/otherthan/thehost
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
anyone encourtered this and what did you do resolve it?
>
> Thanks David
>
>
>
I ended up using -m64 -march=core2 -mtune=core2
(for an imac)
not sure what you have, but here have a look to figure your
processor:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-O
Dan McGhee wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>>> I'm wondering if it's the dhclient-script i.g. had something similar
>>> and it ended up being that.(threw in ubuntu's and bam internet).
>>>
>>>
> Just to make sure--you&#
n my rusty, previous knowlege, that I think it's a simple
> configuration issue and nothing serious. I may have missed something in
> compiling the kernel and have reviewed the situation so many times in
> the last few days that I might not recognize an error if it smacked me
>
>>>> /usr/lib/Scrt1.o
>>>> /usr/lib/crt1.o
>>>> /usr/lib/crti.o
>>>> /usr/lib/crtn.o
>>>> /usr/lib/gcrt1.o
>>>>
>>>> Justin P. Mattock
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You need to copy those to
/usr/lib/crt1.o
/usr/lib/crti.o
/usr/lib/crtn.o
/usr/lib/gcrt1.o
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>
>> If your looking into building
>> x86_64 multlib, or pure64 then go to
>> clfs:
>> http://cross-lfs.org/view/svn/
>> there they have done an excellent job of
>> creating tutorials for the flavor y
---
>
> Add other email accounts to Hotmail in 3 easy steps. Find out how.
> <http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/167688463/direct/01/>
>
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
If your looking into building
x86_64 multlib, or pure64 then go to
clfs:
http://cross-lfs.org/view/svn/
there they have done an excellent job of
creating tutorials for the flavor your trying to build
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ile
> files are correct and can no longer find any more avenues of help.
>
> Chris
>
Is there:
sh -> bash
in /bin?
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
27;t looked into livecd(although there was discussion)
if you just want a quick transfer just:
tar -pczf some_name.tar.gz bin boot etc home (and the rest of dirs)
then unpack on the usb.
as for the 500 mb that's depending on what you as the builder decides.
keep in mind there probably is be
agree, it doesn't matter what the host system
is, as long as it supplies the right tools for you to get the job
done, or built correctly.(the lfs livecd is ideal because it supplies
all the tools, patches, packages etc...)
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
, follow the link below:
http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=1358683573&k=Z31T6VT5R4T16FBCRB2T&r
lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org was invited to join Facebook by Justin P.
Mattock. If you do not wish to receive this type of email from Facebook in the
future, please click on the link
.
I'm not sure why some programs will fail
like that.example mplayer would do that
if I had the flags after ./configure but
before configure mplayer would go through.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Giorgio Gambino wrote:
> *nothing to do :( the compilation makes the same output*..
> *i'm thinking that may be a cpu compatibility problem.. is it possible?*
>
> 2009/8/31 Justin P. Mattock <mailto:justinmatt...@gmail.com>>
>
> Giorgio Gambino wrote:
&g
undefined
> reference to `__sync_bool_compare_and_swap_4'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/libc.so] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.10.1'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
Not sure, you can try and rm the glibc-build directory and start fresh
to see(or just make clean).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
rget
> `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/Versions.all', needed by
> `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/abi-versions.h'. Stop.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.10.1'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> *which problem can be?
> I have not changed anything i've followed the guide*
> *Thanks*
do you have gawk installed, as well as bison, flex
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> I think I screwed up here, when building a pure64
>> I used ubuntu x86_64(which is multilib)
>>
>> after compiling and building everything
>> I chrooted into the directory to build the kernel.
>> Im no
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> I think I screwed up here, when building a pure64
>> I used ubuntu x86_64(which is multilib)
>>
>> after compiling and building everything
>> I chrooted into the directory to build the kernel.
>> Im no
the link to lib which gets
symlinked to lib64
(this is how ubuntu has it setup).
is there a way to adjust this, or should I start over
on a regular 686 and build a pure64 from there
so the linkers get directed to /lib without having
the multilib obstruction?
Justin P. Mattock
--
http
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>
>> So after getting my timer out here are the results:
>> (livecd's)
>> fedora 11 x86_64 = 4:43
>> ubuntu karmic x86_64 = 3:49
>>
>
> Live CDs are always slow due to disk access time.
&
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> Cool, thanks for that.
>>
>
> Welcome.
>
>
>> The main problem I have right now
>> is if I use fedora or ubuntu, it just takes too long
>> to load up(about 10min). I'm loo
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> Cool, thanks for that.
>>
>
> Welcome.
>
>
>> The main problem I have right now
>> is if I use fedora or ubuntu, it just takes too long
>> to load up(about 10min). I'm loo
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> alright,
>> (didn't see that while doing a quick google).
>> There has to be something simple to do this.
>> I myself would like to create an .iso of what I created.
>> So If I blow up my system it a s
hmmm.
maybe /etc/group&passwd isn't correct.
normal this type of error, from what I've experienced
is from not having the symlink.
(other than that not sure).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.or
proble? May i have your help?
>
> thanks a lot!!
>
Not sure what tutorial your using,
but in 6.28.2 at the bottom
it says there's a symlink to the bash program.
maybe this didn't get created, or something
went wrong during your build.
try creating the symlink and see if this works
27;t worry I will)
seems 2.6.31-rc6 is stuck during boot, spent most of the day
trying to locate the commit that causes this stuckage.
(seems to only affect x86_64, as my other system boots fine).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
cool, thanks for the info.
I'll have a look and see if I can do this.
Robert A. Lerche wrote:
> There's an LFS hint describing how to boot LFS without requiring a
> separate partition (i.e., in the same file system as another operating
> system).
>
> The trick is a special "pre-init" program that
nmatt...@gmail.com
> > To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> > Subject: with new system, how to run a test boot?
> >
> > quick question,
> > with a new fresh system in the /where directory
> > is there a way to adjust grub on the host system
> > to a
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>
>> I like that idea, so you would have let's say 3 or 4 100mb
>> test runs setup for multi booting.
>>
>
> I like to use 10GB for the systems. 100MB is way too small. USe the 100MB
> partition f
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> quick question,
>> with a new fresh system in the /where directory
>> is there a way to adjust grub on the host system
>> to actually boot the new system, before moving the newly created
>> system to /
>
quick question,
with a new fresh system in the /where directory
is there a way to adjust grub on the host system
to actually boot the new system, before moving the newly created
system to /
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
ch a patch?
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Michael Tsang wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 14:06:59 Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> Michael Tsang wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday 03 August 2009 20:04:16 Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock:
>>>>On
Michael Tsang wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 14:06:59 Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> Michael Tsang wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday 03 August 2009 20:04:16 Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock:
>>>>On
partitions to get it to work properly).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Michael Tsang wrote:
> On Monday 03 August 2009 20:04:16 Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock:
>> On x86_64, I use "pure64". But then, I'm happy to use lilo and I've
>> no need of pre-built binaries. Certainly, building multilib
Ken Moffat wrote:
> 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock:
>
>> All of this lib64 stuff has me wondering do I really need this?
>> i.g. if I set the compiler flags to x86_64 will the system be x86_64
>> without the need for lib64's, or do I need the lib64's to work wi
Michael Tsang wrote:
> On Monday 03 August 2009 20:04:16 Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock:
>> On x86_64, I use "pure64". But then, I'm happy to use lilo and I've
>> no need of pre-built binaries. Certainly, building multilib
Ken Moffat wrote:
> 2009/8/2 Justin P. Mattock:
>
>> Anyways as for creating ext4 and x86_64 system, I started
>> yesterday, and everything seems good.
>> /lib64 and /usr/lib64 seem simple enough to have the packages
>> go there. but hopefully It's not to
the packages
go there. but hopefully It's not to tough to make it to the xserver etc..
As for the build should I have used x86_64-unkown-linux-gnu
or x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Ken Moffat wrote:
> 2009/8/2 Justin P. Mattock:
>
>> After playing around with fedora 11 I notice they are
>> using ext4. So after thinking..
>> how difficult is this todo on lfs?
>>
>> from installing I noticed I needed
>> (partition for ext4 to
that is needed for the filesystem
to load the O.S.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
> Justin,
> Trim your posts to the minimum needed to reply.
>
> -- Bruce
>
Alright.
(posting on lkml teaches me to do this)
I'll write a post-it note so I don't do this for
LFS.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http
found
>>>>> make: *** [include/config/kernel.release] Error 127
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> I also borrowed .config file from old one incase menuconfig didn't work
>>>
> well
>
>>> - Origi
*** [include/config/kernel.release] Error 127
>>>
>
> I also borrowed .config file from old one incase menuconfig didn't work well
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Justin P. Mattock"
> To: "LFS Support List"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 2
. Try the development version, it
> WFM on newer hosts.
>
> William
>
I'm guessing /bin/sh is not present.
under the instructions it says to create a symlink:
ln -fs /bin/sh bash or /bin/bash sh
(can't remember which way it goes).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linu
Smartboy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> mailto:justinmatt...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Smartboy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> > mailto:justinmatt...@gmail.com>
> <mailto:jus
Smartboy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> mailto:justinmatt...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> khaled gouaich wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> > Thanks for the advice. I'll look for more informations about
> making LiveCD.
> &g
>> --
>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
>> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
>> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>>
>>
There's that app called mastersys or something like that.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ou need recent binutils (binutils-2.8.1.0.23 or
> newer).
> checking for .previous assembler directive... yes
> checking for .protected and .hidden assembler directive... yes
> checking whether __attribute__((visibility())) is supported... yes
> checking for broken __attribute__((visib
cessary lfs user environment is not used.
>
never, ever compile with sudo(golden rule)..
as for this type of error, experience something similar with the xserver
ended I needed to use sh ./autogen.sh to set it right before compiling.
(but this might not be the case for you).
hope this helps.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> Any ideas on why ctl+alt+del doesn't shutdown my machine?
>> the inittab I copied was from 6.54.3
>> which has the entry there, but when exiting
>> the xserver and issuing those commands, I have
>
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> Any ideas on why ctl+alt+del doesn't shutdown my machine?
>> the inittab I copied was from 6.54.3
>> which has the entry there, but when exiting
>> the xserver and issuing those commands, I have
>
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> Any ideas on why ctl+alt+del doesn't shutdown my machine?
>> the inittab I copied was from 6.54.3
>> which has the entry there, but when exiting
>> the xserver and issuing those commands, I have
>
Any ideas on why ctl+alt+del doesn't shutdown my machine?
the inittab I copied was from 6.54.3
which has the entry there, but when exiting
the xserver and issuing those commands, I have
no movement.(also my user name is in shutdown.allow)
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma
of some work, so
> I plan to focus on that as far as my current testing goes. A nice
> TODO for the testers might free up some some developer resources to
> concentrate on the more advanced patching.
>
>
Gnome is cool to build, didn't like building
apach
winter?
> <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Edomain%2Ecom%2Eau%2F%3Fs%5Fcid%3DFDMedia%3ANineMSN%5FHotmail%5FTagline&_t=774152450&_r=Domain_tagline&_m=EXT>
Not sure how grub works,I ended up using grub2.
one thing I noticed is when doing chroot to instal
Thomas Tutone wrote:
>
> --- On Mon, 7/20/09, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>
>> Something to do with the file magic
>>
>> Justin P. Mattock
>>
>
>
> Thanks. magic is a directory, rather than a file, and comes straight out of
> the tar
c'
> ../src/file -C -m ../magic/Magdir
> lt-file: No current entry for continuation
> make[2]: *** [magic.mgc] Error 255
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/file-4.26/magic'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/file-4.26'
&
followed the book word by word,
I ended up just making a /dir in my home directory
and started to fill it up with what I wanted.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
> [Lots o fdeleted stuff]
>
>
>> 30 hours(sh^t) that's too long..
>> As for 6.4 I can't even find that one,
>> I ended up following this:
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/
one used in
> the LFS book (it takes about 30 hours to perform a bootstrap build of
> gcc on my poor 100Mhz PowerPC 601…)
> I didn't use particular CFLAGS for my hardware.
>
> I still suspect a problem with mixed-up search paths…
>
>
> pvg
>
>
> Op 18-jul-09
namic-linker:-dynamic-linker /tools/lib/ld.so.1}}}
>
> Can this have something to do with my problem?
>
>
> pvg
>
>
> Op 16-jul-09, om 21:41 heeft Justin P. Mattock het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Pol Vangheluwe wrote:
>>> But why is it using /lib/libc.so.6 (f
ols/bin/bash
>
> This works perfectly fine.
>
> I am at a loss to figure out what has gone wrong does anyone else have
> a clue?
>
> Thanks
> Russ
>
> ------------
> Click here to find out more POP access for Ho
Pol Vangheluwe wrote:
> But why is it using /lib/libc.so.6 (from the original distribution)
> instead of /lfs/tools/lib/libc.so.6?
>
>
> pvg
>
>
> Op 16-jul-09, om 16:11 heeft Justin P. Mattock het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Pol Vangheluwe wrote:
>>> I a
> LC_ALL=POSIX
> LFS=/mnt/lfs
> PATH=/tools/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
> PWD=/lfs/sources/gcc-build
> PS1=\u:\w\$
> SHLVL=1
> HOME=/home/lfs
> _=/usr/local/bin/env
>
> lfs:/lfs/sources/gcc-build$ locate bin/rm
> /bin/rm
> (…)
> /usr/local/bin/rm
>
…)
> lfs:/lfs/sources/gcc-build$ locate bin/ln
> /bin/ln
> /usr/local/bin/ln
> (…)
>
>
> pvg
>
>
Not sure what might be happening, but
when looking at the web site it suggests that you
build libc in a chroot environment.
(my guess is the above error is due to maybe an older/newer
version clash).
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
; Click Here View photos of singles in your area
> <http://dating.ninemsn.com.au/search/search.aspx?exec=go&tp=q&gc=2&tr=1&lage=18&uage=55&cl=14&sl=0&dist=50&po=1&do=2&trackingid=1046138&r2s=1&_t=773166090&_r=WLM_EndText>
Hey alright
system.
you might want to try the LFS livecd instead of RH due to RH
having SELinux enabled from the start.
(not sure if the lfs livecd has libselinux installed or not)
but if it doesn't then life for you will be easier, as opposed to a system
have all of the SELinux infrastructure compiled in it.
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
