Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 missing file 75-cd-aliases-generator.rules

2012-09-10 Thread Lewis Pike
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:36:50PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > You are right. That section needs to be updated. > > Look in /dev/disk/by-id/. You should see a cd or dvd device. In my > case, I have: > > disk/by-id/ata-PLDS_DVD+_-RW_DH-16A6S -> ../../sr0 > > If I do udevadm test /sys/block/sr0

[lfs-support] LFS 7.2 missing file 75-cd-aliases-generator.rules

2012-09-10 Thread Lewis Pike
LFS 7.2 section 7.5 "Creating Custom Symlinks to Devices" advises the reader to edit /lib/udev/rules.d/75-cd-aliases-generator.rules as needed. Unfortuantely, I can't find this file on my LFS system. It looks like the udev package underwent some signifcant changes between LFS-7.1 & LFS-7.2 so per

[lfs-support] LFS 7.1 rebuilding a kernel with a newer version

2012-08-21 Thread Lewis Pike
After a week and a half of wrestling with LFS, I have successfully built up what appears to be a working system. This was my third attempt and well, you know what they say. Thanks to all of the maintainers for this wonderful resource. In section 6.7.1 of LFS 7.1 I installed the headers for linux

Re: [lfs-support] e2fsprogs test failures on version SVN-20120806

2012-08-17 Thread Lewis Pike
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Lewis Pike wrote: >> Digging a bit deeper into the test suits logs does indeed reveal a >> difference of 18 seconds on the time stamps. I checked and 18 leap >> seconds did occur between the aforementioned dates. >> >> I tried duplicatin

Re: [lfs-support] e2fsprogs test failures on version SVN-20120806

2012-08-16 Thread Lewis Pike
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Yes. That's due to a change in timezone data and adding leap > seconds in glibc. The tests have not caught up with the changes. > Look at the output of the tests: > > -File /lost+found (inode #11, mod time Mon Sep 20 03:26:36 1993) > +File /lost+found (inode #11, mod time Mon

[lfs-support] e2fsprogs test failures on version SVN-20120806

2012-08-16 Thread Lewis Pike
I'm getting some failures during the e2fsprogs test suite in part 3 of LFS Version SVN-20120806; revision 9930, to be exact. This seems related to ticket #3146 [1] in the bug reports. The report indicates that the issue has been fixed in svn r9926 with the upgrade to e2fsprogs-1.42.5. I am at r9