On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:36:50PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> You are right. That section needs to be updated.
>
> Look in /dev/disk/by-id/. You should see a cd or dvd device. In my
> case, I have:
>
> disk/by-id/ata-PLDS_DVD+_-RW_DH-16A6S -> ../../sr0
>
> If I do udevadm test /sys/block/sr0
LFS 7.2 section 7.5 "Creating Custom Symlinks to Devices" advises the
reader to edit /lib/udev/rules.d/75-cd-aliases-generator.rules as
needed. Unfortuantely, I can't find this file on my LFS system.
It looks like the udev package underwent some signifcant changes
between LFS-7.1 & LFS-7.2 so per
After a week and a half of wrestling with LFS, I have successfully
built up what appears to be a working system. This was my third
attempt and well, you know what they say. Thanks to all of the
maintainers for this wonderful resource.
In section 6.7.1 of LFS 7.1 I installed the headers for linux
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Lewis Pike wrote:
>> Digging a bit deeper into the test suits logs does indeed reveal a
>> difference of 18 seconds on the time stamps. I checked and 18 leap
>> seconds did occur between the aforementioned dates.
>>
>> I tried duplicatin
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Yes. That's due to a change in timezone data and adding leap
> seconds in glibc. The tests have not caught up with the changes.
> Look at the output of the tests:
>
> -File /lost+found (inode #11, mod time Mon Sep 20 03:26:36 1993)
> +File /lost+found (inode #11, mod time Mon
I'm getting some failures during the e2fsprogs test suite in part 3 of
LFS Version SVN-20120806; revision 9930, to be exact.
This seems related to ticket #3146 [1] in the bug reports. The report
indicates that the issue has been fixed in svn r9926 with the upgrade
to e2fsprogs-1.42.5.
I am at r9