[lfs-support] Linux 3.1 API headers headers_check Errors

2012-02-27 Thread Kyle Brennan
Hi, I am attempting my first LFS build, and I got to step 5.5 in the book, and everything goes as normal until I hit the command "make headers_check" which gives me multiple errors. they are outlined below. /mnt/lfs/sources/linux-3.1/usr/include/drm/drm_mode.h:85: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} typ

Re: [lfs-support] Linux 3.1 API headers headers_check Errors

2012-02-28 Thread Andrew Benton
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:06:51 -0700 Kyle Brennan wrote: > > Hi, > I am attempting my first LFS build, and I got to step 5.5 in the book, and > everything goes as normal until I hit the command "make headers_check" which > gives me multiple errors. they are outlined below. Where? > /mnt/lfs/

Re: [lfs-support] Linux 3.1 API headers headers_check Errors

2012-02-28 Thread Kyle Brennan
>On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:06:51 -0700 >Kyle Brennan wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> I am attempting my first LFS build, and I got to step 5.5 in the >book, and everything goes as normal until I hit the command "make >headers_check" which gives me multiple errors. they are outlined >below. > >Where? > >>

Re: [lfs-support] Linux 3.1 API headers headers_check Errors

2012-02-28 Thread Andrew Benton
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:13:35 -0800 Kyle Brennan wrote: > Okay. So I did a terrible job explaining what my issue is. I am getting > these errors above when I run the headers check. I'm not sure if they are > normal or not, I tried looking them up and found nothing. I would like to > find ou

Re: [lfs-support] Linux 3.1 API headers headers_check Errors

2012-02-28 Thread Kyle Brennan
Andrew Benton wrote: >On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:13:35 -0800 >Kyle Brennan wrote: > >> Okay. So I did a terrible job explaining what my issue is. I am >getting these errors above when I run the headers check. I'm not sure >if they are normal or not, I tried looking them up and found nothing. >I

Re: [lfs-support] Linux 3.1 API headers headers_check Errors

2012-02-28 Thread Simon Geard
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:01 -0800, Kyle Brennan wrote: > Aha, thanks for clearing that up. I assumed that those messages were > bad because in my experience with Java, any messages of that sort > meant there is some sort of a compile time error. I guess that shows > how much of a Newbie I am.