has been
successful until Chapter 6.
At Chapter 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6 I get the following error when on the configuring
glibc step:
checking sizeof long double... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (long
double), 77
I have searched the archive and google and according to those sources
On Sunday 15 July 2007 10:14 am, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 09:28:23AM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
At Chapter 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6 I get the following error when on the
configuring glibc step:
checking sizeof long double... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof
(long double), 77
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 02:09:51PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
It is hard to parse the config.log in glibc-build directory.
Yes, but it is essential. The last part of it is a dump of all the
variables, which you can probably ignore. Before that, each test in
the configure script typically
On Sunday 15 July 2007 4:06 pm, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 02:09:51PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
It is hard to parse the config.log in glibc-build directory.
Yes, but it is essential. The last part of it is a dump of all the
variables, which you can probably ignore. Before
On 7/15/07, Baho Utot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 4:06 pm, Ken Moffat wrote:
It looks as if glibc is broken, so from here, I _guess_ that
either you went wrong when adjusting the toolchain, or you missed
one of the symlinks, or perhaps you built in stages and
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 04:30:34PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Yes it was a typo it was crt1.o and Scrt1.o
What is it for?
Google probably knows. As far as I'm concerned, they are just
start-up files from glibc. I don't have any interest in the
minutiae of the toolchain :-)
I did some C
On 7/15/07, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 04:30:34PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Yes it was a typo it was crt1.o and Scrt1.o
What is it for?
Google probably knows. As far as I'm concerned, they are just
start-up files from glibc. I don't have any interest