Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>> * Does the community still want the LiveCD project? (Consider that a
>> couple of the arguments above imply that the LFS LiveCD by its nature is
>> degrading the quality of LFS)
>>
>> * If so, is the community prepared to lend help in keep
support wrote:
> Multiple 'windows' don't require X, personally i logon to 2 or 3 virtual
> terminals, carry out the lfs build work in terminal 1 and have a copy of
> the book open via lynx in terminal 2, then i can simply select with the
> mouse to highlight and right click in VT1 to paste. To op
Laurent HOAREAU wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork a écrit :
>
>> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>>
>>
>>> * Does the community still want the LiveCD project?
>>>
> (Consider that a
>
>>> couple of the arguments above imply that the LFS
>>>
> LiveCD by its nature is
>
>>> degrading
Jeremy Huntwork a écrit :
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>> * Does the community still want the LiveCD project?
(Consider that a
>> couple of the arguments above imply that the LFS
LiveCD by its nature is
>> degrading the quality of LFS)
>>
>> * If so, is the community prepared to lend help in
ke
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> So we see at least two non-empty camps. One wants a strictly minimal CD, and
> one
> wants packages beyond it. The most "democratic" solution would be to make two
> CDs (and that's, in fact, the origin of the talks about package management),
> but
> we don't have
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
~snip~
>
> I could let this thread continue for some more time, but I get the
> impression that the ratio of votes will continue approximately the same.
as with the last time this subject came up :)
seems that while majority like the livecd project, getting more support
is
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>> * Does the community still want the LiveCD project? (Consider that a
>> couple of the arguments above imply that the LFS LiveCD by its nature is
>> degrading the quality of LFS)
>>
>> * If so, is the community prepared to lend help in keepin
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> * Does the community still want the LiveCD project? (Consider that a
> couple of the arguments above imply that the LFS LiveCD by its nature is
> degrading the quality of LFS)
>
> * If so, is the community prepared to lend help in keeping it alive?
Thank you all for you
