On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:47:45 +0100
Frans de Boer wrote:
> I have said that I will forward some patches to get rid of the
> [...]/lib64 notions after I have tested my older patches against the
> newest sources.
>
> I have created several source code changes and tested them, only to find
> out
> From: ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:03:20 +0600
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] How can I install binutils and gcc with one pass
> to build temporary system?
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/
> binutils-pass2.html , http://www.linuxfrom
> chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
> HOME=/root \
> TERM="$TERM"\
> PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
> PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
> /tools/bin/bash --login +h
>
> Why are /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /sbin, /bin in chroot command? Are
On 21-12-16 17:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Frans de Boer wrote:
On 20-12-16 23:02, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Frans de Boer wrote:
On 20-12-16 21:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Frans de Boer wrote:
Hi all,
I just noticed that there are changes in the development version of
LFS,
related to x86_64 architecture. B
ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/chroot.html
chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root \
TERM="$TERM"\
PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools
> From: ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:13:56 +0600
> Subject: [lfs-support] Why are /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /sbin in chroot command?
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/chroot.html
>
> chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
> HOME=/root
