AND IF I remember correctly YACC will be installed when you install one of
the other programs.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it mess
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Chris Staub wrote:
> On 01/02/2016 05:53 PM, Paul Rogers wrote:
>
>> Running the Ch4 prereqs I find the following deficiencies:
>>
>> yacc links to bison:yacc not found <--- easily fixed
>> gawk >= 4.0.1: GNU Awk 3.1.7
>> glibc >= 2.5.1: (
strings znew
igawk strip
root@debian:/home/lfs#
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:20 AM, William Harrington
wrote:
> On Thu, November 5, 2015 12:39, Michael Havens wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:58 PM, William Harrington <
> kb0...@berzerkula.org>
> > wrote:
> >&g
>
>
>
> Have you done something simple like got $PATH wrong - e.g. have you
> incorrectly put a space after the first colon, such that it's only looking
> in /tools/. , and skipping /bin &c.
>
>
> What do you get from:
>
> echo $PATH
>
~$ echo $PATH
/tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
> Also, when doi
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:58 PM, William Harrington
wrote:
>
> run the following, your interpreter may be wrong or missing:
>
> readelf -e /tools/bin/ls | grep interp
>
~$ readelf -e /tools/bin/ls | grep interp
bash: /tools/bin/readelf: No such file or directory
bash: /tools/bin/grep: No such file
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Thanos Baloukas wrote:
> On 04/11/2015 10:17 μμ, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> Okay, I do not know what I did but some commands work (cd) and some
>> don't (cp, tar, mv).
>>
>
> Just a <> doesn't help.
> What are the
Okay, I do not know what I did but some commands work (cd) and some don't
(cp, tar, mv). I'm thinking my bash_profile has someting to do with it. I
did:
cat > ~/.bashrc << "EOF"
set +h
umask 022
LFS=/mnt/lfs
LC_ALL=POSIX
LFS_TGT=$(uname -m)-lfs-linux-gnu
PATH=/tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
export LFS L
Thanks.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad th
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Pat Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 15:22 -0500, Michael Havens wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Michael Havens
> > wrote:
> > I think maybe a recompile from the section after glibc is in
> >
>
>
>> All of the GLIBC_PRIVATE lines seem to me like you are attempting to use
>> LTO. Are you using LTO?
>>
>> You are only one person out of many who can't build a complete system
>> without many errors which you can easily search the last ten years of
>> archives from many mailing lists. the LF
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
> I think maybe a recompile from the section after glibc is in order. I say
> the chapter after because it appears as if gibc compiled correctly. Not
> hearing any responses by tomorrow I will assume the is agreement with my
>
I think maybe a recompile from the section after glibc is in order. I say
the chapter after because it appears as if gibc compiled correctly. Not
hearing any responses by tomorrow I will assume the is agreement with my
plan.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Michael Havens wrote:
> I did
I didn't deviate from the book though. I followed their instructions to the
tee.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:07 PM, William Harrington
wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:19:32 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > > the complete makelog is found:
> > >
> > > http://pastebin.com/GFtFP9Ng
> >
> > Well the
Okay, I decided to, before the recompile, to verify my make log. I couldn't
find the given error. I am not sure what I should do know! Should I
recompile glibc? I re-ran the verification program and it did complete so
now what?
lfs@debian:/mnt/lfs/sources$ echo 'int main(){}' > dummy.c
lfs@debian:
My su is to chmod/chown the file I scp from the main computer to the lfs
computer.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 04:10:52PM -0500, Michael Havens wrote:
> > Good afternoon. I am on section 5.33 .
> > Here is what I enter in
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Well the lines like
>
> /tools/lib/libpthread.so.0: undefined reference to
> `__getrlimit@GLIBC_PRIVATE'
>
> tell me that something is wrong with your glibc install. It is missing a
> library.
>
> $ cd /usr/lib
> $ grep __getrlimit -r *
> Bin
Good afternoon. I am on section 5.33 .
Here is what I enter into the computer:
#scp bmike1@192.168.0.2:/home/bmike1/Documents/LFS/7.8/build/5.33build.txt
$LFS/sources;exit
#chmod 777 $LFS/sources/5.33build.txt; chown lfs
$LFS/sources/5.33build.txt;su - lfs
#cd $sources;./5.33build.txt
tar xf util-
I just discovered that the logs for 5.23 were not created.is this because
it may have created the logs in the directory that the -C flag refered to?
#5.23
tar xf gettext-0.19.5.1.tar.xz
cd gettext-0.19.5.1
cd gettext-tools
EMACS="no" ./configure --prefix=/tools --disable-shared
( make -C gnulib
boy am I glad I saved my build scripts! I sure did forget to do that!
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which
error:
checking for Tcl private include files... configure: error: Cannot find
private header tclInt.h in /mnt/lfs/sources/tcl8.6.4
I looked in the files config.log and the words 'private' and 'header' and
'error' do not occur in it. Am I inspecting the proper file? I'm looking in:
expect5.45/conf
okay. I'm not sure but I think I created nano /root/.bash_profile .
Should I delete it or does it matter. I don't think it matters.
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above informati
What in the world? I could swear I read that it wen into bash_profile!
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which
The $LFS is set. I'm trying to set another variable
sources=$LFS/sources. it refuses to stay set.
lfs@debian:~$ cat ~/.bash_profile
exec env -i HOME=$HOME TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' /bin/bash
export LFS=/mnt/lfs
export sources=$LFS/sources
lfs@debian:~$ exit
exit
root@debian:~# su - lfs
lfs@deb
I want to make it easy to get to a certain directory.
Why doesn't it retain $LFS/sources ?
root@debian:~# cat /root/.bash_profile
export LFS=/mnt/lfs
export sources=$LFS/sources
root@debian:~# su - lfs
lfs@debian:~$ cat ~/.bash_profile
exec env -i HOME=$HOME TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' /bin/bash
exp
Yes, you are correct when you mentioned I have done LFS before but never
successfully. The reason I gave up in the previous try is the computer I
was sshing with blew up and so I had to put make the LFS machine my main
computer.
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-s
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Pierre Labastie
wrote:
>
> Two solutions:
> - Use ln -sf (force)
> - remove the link command from your script...
>
Thank you Pierre force option it is.
As for my first run having already created it not really. It ran for lie 10
seconds and then barfed up the rest
I think I do.
>
> --
:-)~MIKE~(-:
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why i
I wrote the script for 5.10 and ran it but messed something up. I fixed it
and ran it again to find I did something else wrong
One of the last lines said:
ln: failed to create symbolic link `/tools/bin/cc': File exists
Do I need to delete this file before running it again?
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
--
ht
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> If possible, it'd be better to make a difference between the source files
>> (configure, *.c, etc) and the source packages (usually compressed tar
>> archives). You have to remove all the source files (includ
>
>
> If possible, it'd be better to make a difference between the source files
> (configure, *.c, etc) and the source packages (usually compressed tar
> archives). You have to remove all the source files (including the directory
> where they reside), and also anything in the /mnt/lfs tree, except
okay... I will rm binutil and . As for the source directory: you don't mean
$LFS/sources ? I think you mean the directories created during the build.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Craig Garner
wrote:
>
>> Whenever you change a setting on the host, when testing host system
>> requirements, and
>
>
> Well, I've never seen one like that. Looks like something on line
> 106 of /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/as
>
> I assume that at this point that 'as' file must be a
> script. Perhaps it is trying to exec a variable. Is it a script ?
> If so, what is the hunk which includes line 106 ?
>
t 26, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
> /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log
> http://hastebin.com/jeqocobisa.vbs
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>>
>>> Hastebin your log http://hastebin.com/
>
/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log
http://hastebin.com/jeqocobisa.vbs
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> Hastebin your log http://hastebin.com/
>>
>> Use:
>> /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/lib
>
>
> Hastebin your log http://hastebin.com/
>
> Use:
> /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log
>
> We can find the error rather quickly if you post the actual config.log.
>
What's wrong with pastebin??f
http://pastebin.com/hBDE6XGf
http://hastebin.com/ocatakaduf.vbs
Pl
I just found out about the gcc and probably the g++ errors (though I could
find nothing to verify that idea):
Citing this:
-
http://serverfault.com/questions/580489/configure-error-c-compiler-cannot-create-executables-while-build-ruby-from-sou
gcc -V is a way of selecting a specific gcc
>
>
> configure:4339: gcc -V >&5
> gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'
> gcc: fatal error: no input files
> compilation terminated.
>
> I looked in the compile log but '-V' does not show up on lin 4339 nor does
> it appears elsewhere in the file.
> --
> :-)~MIKE~(-:
>
the same error
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:02 PM, William Harrington
wrote:
>
> The error is near line 3698 above it.
> You can't stop at every error in the config.log. Some are critical and
> stop the configure process, many don't as they are tests based on the host
> build environment.
>
3690
-o build/gcov-iov.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:49 PM, William Harrington
wrote:
> On Mon, October 26, 2015 14:06, Michael Havens wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ken Moffat
> > wrote:
> >
> >> What you have to do is work out in which directory configure was last
>
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> What you have to do is work out in which directory configure was last
> run, i.e. identify the *newest* config.log file and then search for
> 'cannot compute suffix of object files'. Use less or vim to search,
> e.g.
>
> /cannot\ compute\ suff
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> thank you for taking the time to help.
>> from what you've said seems to imply I need to compile binutilities again.
>> so:
>>
&g
>
>
> Take it slowly, at this point the main things you need to do are to
> learn (the cp / tar business), and then to remember what you learn.
>
Ken, could you recommend something to read?
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.htm
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
> thank you for taking the time to help.
> from what you've said seems to imply I need to compile binutilities again.
> so:
>
>
>
Now we'll compile 5.5 again and see where I wind u
es/binutils-build/libiberty/testsuite'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/libiberty'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `install-target'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build'
GOOD
it appears to have run successfully.
On Sun, Oct 2
I followed the instruction yet the compile still will not complete.
compile log: http://pastebin.com/Bsri0v4n
I looked through the compile log and the only errors I could find not
associated with code was:
checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in
`/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/x8
You know I was wondering why I didn't have the kind of trouble with 5.4
that I am having with 5.5 so to make sure everything ran correctly I:
lfs@debian:/mnt/lfs/sources$ tail 5.4compilelog
make[5]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../binutils-2.2
>
> bash version-check.sh
>
> bash, version 4.2.37(1)-release
>
> /bin/sh -> /bin/dash
>
> [Did you notice that you have dash (that's spelled with D as in dog
> instead of B as in boy)? -- jl]
>
I did notice it but I didn't get a error so I figured all was well. What do
you suggest I do to fix it i
google seems to be messing up. you asked about version-check.sh?
I did check it before beginning and installed some missing programs.
:
I did check it and installed missing programs
bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.37(1)-release
/bin/sh -> /bin/dash
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Debian)
I did check it and installed missing programs
>
>
> What is the output of version-check.sh? You did check that, didn't you?
>
I did check it and installed missing programs
bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.37(1)-release
/bin/sh -> /bin/dash
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.2
\
--disable-libstdcxx\
--enable-languages=c,c++
( make 2>&1 | tee ../5.5.compile.log && exit $PIPESTATUS ) && echo GOOD
make install
here are the compile/config logs:
http://pastebin.com/Bsri0v4n
Could you possibly show me what to look f
Sorry about the top post. It was not my intention to do so.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people nor
>
>
> The ../ tells it to use the package 1 dir up. You are just making extra
> copies that don't even get extracted.
>
>
sorry it took so long to understand.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above in
hahaha... I get it!
cp ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz . copy a file in a directory
above
cp ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz .
cp ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz .
tar -xf ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz
mv -v mpfr-3.1.3 mpfrun tar a file in a directory
above
tar -xf ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz
mv -v gmp
>
> Yes, but you have three meaningless cp commands in your script. Part of
> the LFS goals is to teach how to visualize what the commands are doing.
> You are not doing that yet. Why do you think the cp commands are needed?
> They are not in the book.
>
But the book says to 'Unpack each package
So please,
what about this is wrong:
tar -xf gcc-5.2.0.tar.bz2
cd gcc-5.2.0
cp ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz .
cp ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz .
cp ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz .
tar -xf ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz
mv -v mpfr-3.1.3 mpfr
tar -xf ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz
mv -v gmp-6.0.0 gmp
tar -xf ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz
mv -v mpc-1.0.3 m
tar -xf gcc-5.2.0.tar.bz2
cd gcc-5.2.0
cp ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz .
cp ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz .
cp ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz .
tar -xf ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz
mv -v mpfr-3.1.3 mpfr
tar -xf ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz
mv -v gmp-6.0.0 gmp
tar -xf ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz
mv -v mpc-1.0.3 mpc
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.o
>
>
> No. It is tar -xf ../ so you are in the build dir and extracting from
> sources.
>
>
That's the way I got it.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this li
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>>>> You don't need to copy since you are extracting from the source
>>> directory.
>>>
>>> So then you untar the files in $LFS/sources?
>
from $LFS/sources :
tar -xjf gcc-5.2.0.tar.bz
>
>
>>> You don't need to copy since you are extracting from the source
>> directory.
>>
>> So then you untar the files in $LFS/sources?
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Craig Garner
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Havens wrote:
>>>
>>>>
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> when I first began playing with LFS I was instructed to script my build so
>> that is what I do. I was also instructed to build it on a virtual machine
>> but because you can get
Okay, my build failed. Here are the commands I entered
1. #5.5
2. tar -xjf gcc-5.2.0.tar.bz2
3. cd gcc-5.2.0
4. cp ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz .
5. cp ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz .
6. cp ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz .
7. tar -xJf ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz
8. mv -v mpfr-3.1.3 mpfr
9. tar -xJf ../gm
when I first began playing with LFS I was instructed to script my build so
that is what I do. I was also instructed to build it on a virtual machine
but because you can get recycled computers from universities I decided to
build lfs on one of those instead (I got an optiplex 755 for less than
$25.
Here are the instructions in question:
tar -xf ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz
mv -v mpfr-3.1.3 mpfr
tar -xf ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz
mv -v gmp-6.0.0 gmp
tar -xf ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz
mv -v mpc-1.0.3 mpc
They forgot to put the proper zip flag.
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-s
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=telnet+source+code&t=lm
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Perhaps I'll disable the r* programs, but we still want ftp and telnet.
> We could add one of the ftp programs like vsftpd, but that goes against the
> intended minimal set of packages in LFS. I do not know where else the
> telnet program cou
stupid thing panicked again.
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Pierre Labastie
wrote:
> Le 12/09/2014 09:49, Michael Havens a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Pierre Labastie <
>> pierre.labas...@neuf.fr <mailto:pierre.labas...@neuf.fr>> wr
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Pierre Labastie
wrote:
>
>
>> What I would do for a first LFS build is to copy the host configuration
> (on Debian, it is /boot/config-) to .config
> after running "make mrproper", then type "make oldconfig" (you may have to
> answer a few questions if the LFS j
what is the use of setting both ...ext3... and ...ext4... to 'y'?
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Bruce Dubbs
>> wrote:
>>
>> That's right. Assuming
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> That's right. Assuming SATA, one of these should be set:
> # SATA SFF controllers with BMDMA
> CONFIG_ATA_PIIX=y
> # CONFIG_SATA_MV is not set
> # CONFIG_SATA_NV is not set
> # CONFIG_SATA_PROMISE is not set
> # CONFIG_SATA_SIL is not set
>
Fernando hijacked the thread but I need to start a new one anyways.
So I need to recompile the kernel because some options are needed for
my hardware(?). Well, that is kinda vague instructions.
Well, here is a link to lshw for the box I am installing lfs on:
https://www.firedrive.com/shar
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
It's finding the kernel, so the grub problem is solved. The build of the
> kernel is wrong for your system. It can't find the drivers needed for
> mounting the root directory.
>
> Try: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/
>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> menuentry "GNU/Linux, Linux 3.13.3-lfs-7.5" {
> set root=(hd0,6)
> linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.3-lfs-7.5 root=/dev/sda6 ro
> }
>
thanks for teaching me that! It still didn't boot though. The first line
says :
Kernel panic - not syn
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> The error is in grub.cfg - I suspect you have not copied the lfs
> kernel to the debian /boot partition. So, if the lfs kernel is on
> sda6 along with the lfs system, try
>
> set root='hd0,6'
>
> but ONLY do that in the lfs entry.
>
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Don't believe it ;-) Actually, chmod +w probably helps.
did you want me to add the write bit to my lfs?
vim /boot/grub/grub.cfg is the way to go.
>
don't get mad. I used pico.
Yes, add it at the end of grub.cfg but change it to the
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
> okay I got the GUI computer going again. So I type in:
>
>pico /boot/grub/grub.cfg
>
> and the very first lines say:
>
>#
># DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
>#
># It is automatically
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> I can't work with this right now with just the terminal. I'll need to
>> wait until after I get my gui computer working again. Sorry
>
>
>
&
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
> I can't work with this right now with just the terminal. I'll need to
> wait until after I get my gui computer working again. Sorry
Sorry about the top posting. Working with Lynx as my browser I couldn't put
my
I can't work with this right now with just the terminal. I'll need to
wait until after I get my gui computer working again. Sorry.
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information p
Right now I have my GUI computer packed away (taking it to my Dad's
and we're going to try to get the keys that aren't working fixed
tomorrow) so I can't make this email pretty (I'm using Lynx now).
Right now I am on the Linux from Scratch host machine.
Bruce, grub.conf? What do I need to change?
well, I reboot the system and the only OS I had the option to install was
debian. I guess this means I need to do it again. Or maybe I installed grub
incrrectly. hmm.
:-)~MIKE~(-:
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsub
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:15:53PM -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> > Before BLFS.
> > I'm installing gpm and these are the errors make and make install gives
> me
>
--snip--
>
> Looking at my own
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Yes, but there are different techniques for using it. I have
> /mnt/lfs/sources that contains all the LFS packages. For BLFS, I keep
> sources on a separate partition mounted as /usr/src. I then bind mount
> /mnt/lfs/usr/src to /usr/src for a
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:03 AM, akhiezer wrote:
> > From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sun Sep 7 10:58:22
> 2014
> > Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 10:58:01 +0100
> > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> > To: LFS Support List
> > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] section 9.3
> >
> > > > Bea
Before BLFS.
I'm installing gpm and these are the errors make and make install gives me.
Now it seems that (after googling 'fatal error: gpm.h: No such file or
directory') that there is no problem but I need to verify this. Upon
looking at this closer that is all I need to ask about.
root:/sources
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
> uh-oh. I installed lynx with no problems. Then I unpacked gpm, ran cd
> into the gpm directory, and then the terminal froze. I couldn't nor
> ^C. I shut the terminal down and then started another one and now I can't
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Before you boot the new system, I don't think you have much choice.
> Actually, I _suppose_ you could add your normal user (in fact, doing
> that before booting _is_ a good idea, then if all goes well you can
> log in as a user when the system
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:03 AM, akhiezer wrote:
>
> Just to perhaps clarify: when you run scp, it is very likely (at this
> stage)
> connecting to the host-os (ubuntu or debian or mint or whatever) on the
> build-machine; the lfs os that you're building, isn't yet 'in control' of
> the machine. S
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:25 PM, akhiezer wrote:
> Bear in mind too that your lfs build environment is inside a chroot, and
> so won't see all of the host-os filesystem. You (basically) need to get
> the 'lynx2.8.8rel.2.tar.bz2' file into a directory that can be seen from
> within the chroot.
>
>
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:25 PM, akhiezer wrote:
> > From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sat Sep 6 22:14:44
> 2014
> > Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:14:33 +0100
> > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> > To: LFS Support List
> > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] section 9.3
:-)~MIKE~(-:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 1:02 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>
>> > From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sat Sep 6
>> 20:35:23 2014
>> > From: Michael Havens
>> > Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 12:38:17 -0700
>> > To: LFS Suppo
you solved my problem. I needed to scp to user root.
I should have figured that out!
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 1:02 PM, akhiezer wrote:
> > From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sat Sep 6 20:35:23
> 2014
> > From: Michael Havens
> > Date: Sat
Thanks. I'll deal with that when it happens:!)
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Hazel Russman
wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 11:51:35 -0700
> Michael Havens wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Hazel Russman <
> hazeldeb...@googlemail.com>
&
I finished! Before I boot into the new system they say to install a few
BLFS programs to make it easier before I leave the chroot environment. So
I download the first program, check the md5sum of it, and then try to scp
that program to the lfs computer with the following results:
bmike1@CQ57-1
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Hazel Russman
wrote:
> You don't actually need a separate boot partition. What the instructions
> are referring to is whatever partition GRUB should go to to find your
> kernel and other files. This could be a separate partition mounted on /boot
> or it could just
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
> I'm almost done with the base LFS system. The error I am getting now is:
>
> Makefile:1024: recipe for target 'modules_install' failed
>
> I'm thinking that it is because I'm not installing any mod
I'm in the step in which they talk about the boot partition and grub. I
have a couple of questions about the boot partition before I proceed:
Do all Linux distos look for a boot partition first or else how does this
work?
The instructions say to modify fstab. Here is the current fstab for lfs:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:51 PM, akhiezer wrote:
> > From: Michael Havens
> > Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 16:40:06 -0700
> > To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> > Subject: [lfs-support] section 8.3
> >
> .
> .
> > grep -E 'erro
I'm almost done with the base LFS system. The error I am getting now is:
Makefile:1024: recipe for target 'modules_install' failed
I'm thinking that it is because I'm not installing any modules
This is what I entered to get to that point:
make>>make.fail 2>&1
make modules_install>>install.fail
It used to be. For modern glibc, I have no idea. Why not just use
> the extra six characters and specify en_US.UTF-8 ?
>
> en_US.UTF-8? Really? I was thinking the right thing to do was to use
en_US.iso88591 because en_US locale is it's alias. So, you are saying to
use en_US.UTF-8?
--
http://l
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
