Diego Biurrun writes:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:38:29PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>> >> Other than that,
>> >> this feels like it belongs in compat/ rather than libavutil. Not really
>> >> sure how best to build it though.
>> >
>> > I was actually thinking of
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:38:29PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> >> Other than that,
> >> this feels like it belongs in compat/ rather than libavutil. Not really
> >> sure how best to build it though.
> >
> > I was actually thinking of that for the header, yes. I supp
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [.. as for the rest ..]
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [.. as for the rest ..]
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>>>
> Other than that,
> this feels like it belongs in compat/ rather t
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> Hi,
>
> [.. as for the rest ..]
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>>
Other than that,
this feels like it belongs in compat/ rather than libavutil. Not really
sure how best to build it though.
>>>
>
Hi,
[.. as for the rest ..]
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>
>>> Other than that,
>>> this feels like it belongs in compat/ rather than libavutil. Not really
>>> sure how best to build it though.
>>
>> I was actually thinking of that for the h
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
+} else if (!av_strncasecmp(nptr, "0x", 2) ||
+ !av_strncasecmp(nptr, "-0x", 3) ||
+ !av_strncasecmp(nptr, "+0x", 3)) {
+return strtol(nptr, endptr, 1
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>> Other than that,
>> this feels like it belongs in compat/ rather than libavutil. Not really
>> sure how best to build it though.
>
> I was actually thinking of that for the header, yes. I suppose we can
> do it for the source also, but then again, we'd need to link
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>> I'm adding this under _MSC_VER (rather than a configure check) because
>> I'm not quite sure how the configure check would work, so consider this
>> a RFC more than anything. The idea is to compile in os_sup
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
+} else if (!av_strncasecmp(nptr, "0x", 2) ||
+ !av_strncasecmp(nptr, "-0x", 3) ||
+
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>>> +} else if (!av_strncasecmp(nptr, "0x", 2) ||
>>> + !av_strncasecmp(nptr, "-0x", 3) ||
>>> + !av_strncasecmp(nptr, "+0x", 3)) {
>>> +
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
>> +} else if (!av_strncasecmp(nptr, "0x", 2) ||
>> + !av_strncasecmp(nptr, "-0x", 3) ||
>> + !av_strncasecmp(nptr, "+0x", 3)) {
>> +return strtol(nptr, endptr, 16);
>
>
"Ronald S. Bultje" writes:
> From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
>
> I'm adding this under _MSC_VER (rather than a configure check) because
> I'm not quite sure how the configure check would work, so consider this
> a RFC more than anything. The idea is to compile in os_support.c (or
> maybe rename it to m
On 08/03/2012 01:37 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> I'm adding this under _MSC_VER (rather than a configure check) because
> I'm not quite sure how the configure check would work, so consider this
> a RFC more than anything. The idea is to compile in os_support.c (or
> maybe rename it to msvc_compat.
From: "Ronald S. Bultje"
I'm adding this under _MSC_VER (rather than a configure check) because
I'm not quite sure how the configure check would work, so consider this
a RFC more than anything. The idea is to compile in os_support.c (or
maybe rename it to msvc_compat.c) only for MSVC, and force-i
15 matches
Mail list logo