This function is like _aligned_malloc(), but part of the statically
linked mingw runtime, so it's available regardless of the targeted
MSVCRT version.
---
configure |4 +++-
libavutil/mem.c |6 ++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
Martin Storsjö writes:
> This function is like _aligned_malloc(), but part of the statically
> linked mingw runtime, so it's available regardless of the targeted
> MSVCRT version.
> ---
> configure |4 +++-
> libavutil/mem.c |6 ++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Martin Storsjö writes:
This function is like _aligned_malloc(), but part of the statically
linked mingw runtime, so it's available regardless of the targeted
MSVCRT version.
---
configure |4 +++-
libavutil/mem.c |6 ++
2 files chan
Martin Storsjö writes:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> Martin Storsjö writes:
>>
>>> This function is like _aligned_malloc(), but part of the statically
>>> linked mingw runtime, so it's available regardless of the targeted
>>> MSVCRT version.
>>> ---
>>> configure |4
On 18/06/2012 4:04 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Maybe it's time to drop win2k support. Does anyone actually still use it?
I think we should. MS doesn't even support it anymore. If someone
is using it, they're already using unpatched and unsupported
software.
- Derek
___
On Monday, June 18, 2012, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 18/06/2012 4:04 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Maybe it's time to drop win2k support. Does anyone actually still use
it?
>
> I think we should. MS doesn't even support it anymore. If someone
> is using it, they're already using unpatched and uns
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 04:20:53PM -0400, Sean McGovern wrote:
> On Monday, June 18, 2012, Derek Buitenhuis
> wrote:
> > On 18/06/2012 4:04 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> Maybe it's time to drop win2k support. Does anyone actually still use
> it?
> >
> > I think we should. MS doesn't even support
