On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 24/11/14 14:49, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/11/14 16:41, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>>>
And with the power of git am and sed, here is the updated set, with
small
>>
On 24/11/14 14:49, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 20/11/14 16:41, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
And with the power of git am and sed, here is the updated set, with small
cosmetic fixes here and there. I reorder the set in three "chapters", and
I'd n
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 20/11/14 16:41, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>
>> And with the power of git am and sed, here is the updated set, with small
>> cosmetic fixes here and there. I reorder the set in three "chapters", and
>> I'd not mind to squash the cosmetics in
On 20/11/14 16:41, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
And with the power of git am and sed, here is the updated set, with small
cosmetic fixes here and there. I reorder the set in three "chapters", and
I'd not mind to squash the cosmetics in a single one.
Vittorio
If there isn't any other comment I'd me
And with the power of git am and sed, here is the updated set, with small
cosmetic fixes here and there. I reorder the set in three "chapters", and
I'd not mind to squash the cosmetics in a single one.
Vittorio
Luca Barbato (21):
cosmetics: Format mjpeg_parser
cosmetics: Format aac_ac3_parser
On 20/11/14 07:03, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Luca Barbato (2014-11-19 22:18:41)
>> On 19/11/14 18:42, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> For public function sure, for small utility functions that will change
>> totally in the next month or two, I'd say *discussing* is overkill.
>>
>>> A bet
Quoting Luca Barbato (2014-11-19 22:18:41)
> On 19/11/14 18:42, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
[...]
>
> For public function sure, for small utility functions that will change
> totally in the next month or two, I'd say *discussing* is overkill.
>
> > A better grouping could be
> >
> > ff_ + ${obje
On 19/11/14 18:42, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> On 19/11/14 07:22, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Vittorio Giovara
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 18/11/14 09:16, He
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 19/11/14 07:22, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Vittorio Giovara
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 18/11/14 09:16, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at
On 19/11/14 07:22, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Vittorio Giovara
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> On 18/11/14 09:16, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 18/11/14 00:57, K
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> On 18/11/14 09:16, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>>
On 18/11/14 00:57, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> I added ff_combine_packet
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 18/11/14 09:16, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/11/14 00:57, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> I added ff_combine_packet since it reduces the number of lines
> and makes the code sl
On 18/11/14 09:16, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>
>> On 18/11/14 00:57, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
I added ff_combine_packet since it reduces the number of lines
and makes the code slightly less verbose.
>>>
>>> This is very confusing since ff_
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 18/11/14 00:57, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> >> I added ff_combine_packet since it reduces the number of lines
> >> and makes the code slightly less verbose.
> >
> > This is very confusing since ff_combine_packet suggests an AVPacket is
> involv
On 18/11/14 00:57, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> I added ff_combine_packet since it reduces the number of lines
>> and makes the code slightly less verbose.
>
> This is very confusing since ff_combine_packet suggests an AVPacket is
> involved.
It will and it is not less confusing that using "frame" si
> I added ff_combine_packet since it reduces the number of lines
> and makes the code slightly less verbose.
This is very confusing since ff_combine_packet suggests an AVPacket is involved.
Kieran
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https
The function may return a non-fatal error (needs more data) and
a fatal error (not enough memory).
I went over the codebase and fixed that all over and not just
where coverity spotted it.
I added ff_combine_packet since it reduces the number of lines
and makes the code slightly less verbose.
__
17 matches
Mail list logo
