Hey guys,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Mike Melanson wrote:
> What's the minimum level of quality an encoder should meet in order to be
> included in the codebase? 2 items:
>
> 1) I wrote an Apple Graphics/SMC video encoder that operates on a lossless
> principle rather than attempting to mak
Mike Melanson skrev 2011-07-23 00:50:
2) There's a usable Cinepak encoder patch out there. It's chatty but it
does the job. I don't know about the overall quality but given the vintage
of the codec, the encoder is probably doing a good job. Should we push it
in?
I just figured out that the auth
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:43:45PM -0700, Mike Melanson wrote:
> What's the minimum level of quality an encoder should meet in order to be
> included in the codebase? 2 items:
>
> 1) I wrote an Apple Graphics/SMC video encoder that operates on a lossless
> principle rather than attempting to make
> 2) There's a usable Cinepak encoder patch out there. It's chatty but it
> does the job. I don't know about the overall quality but given the vintage
> of the codec, the encoder is probably doing a good job. Should we push it
> in?
I just figured out that the author of this patch is on the list.
