-- Forwarded message --
From: "Tim Bonnemann"
Date: Nov 25, 2013 3:05 AM
Subject: [NCDD-DISCUSSION] Looking for examples of technology-enabled
dialogue for peacebuilding
To:
Cc:
Hi,
Interesting conference I just found out about:
http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2013/11/18/build-
Hello all,
Submit now: https://www.opentechfund.org/submit
We are excited to share the news that the Open Technology Fund’s ongoing
solicitation of concept notes is open and receiving proposals for the
next round. We seek to fund disruptive technology projects that advance
global Internet freedom
Thank you for posting my other two events.
Here are two more:
http://uknewvoices.eventbrite.com
http://ukneighbours.eventbrite.com
Slides and more along the way: http://bit.ly/clifteu13
Steven Clift
>From Estonia
P.S. I was told there is an international Internet Freedom conference here
next ye
Hello LibTech,
The Open Technology Fund is surveying projects working on next
generation secure email or email-like communication. The purpose of this
survey is to identify potential areas of collaboration, better
understand the trade-offs made by the different projects, and to help
the internet f
Thanks for sharing the projects being funded.
Just out of curiosity, can you disclose the donors/ source of funding of the
secure email support initiative.
Thanks!
Robert
On 2013-11-25, at 12:01 PM, Dan Meredith wrote:
> Hello LibTech,
>
> The Open Technology Fund is surveying projects wor
Heya Robert,
Apologies if the initial email wasn't clear. The purpose is a survey to
map the space. The listed projects are merely projects publicly known to
be developing secure email technology. As such, they have been invited
to volunteer their time to complete the survey. Our commitment is to
Dear Libtech,
In a new turn of events today users from across Pakistan faced issue
while accessing a particular movie title on imdb.com. While IMDb
remains open, the page for movie “The Line of Freedom” remains
inaccessible. “The Line of Freedom” is a short baloch film. It should
be noted here tha
First of all thank you for picking up this important topic -
it's the kind of outcome out of the PGP criticism I had hoped
for. Congratulations on the insight and depth of the questions
in the form - looks like a better and more comprehensive survey
than my tentative comparison page. :-)
The reas
carlo von lynX writes:
> Hm, federation is so commonly expected to be the normality that
> any distributed system is filed under "p2p" even if, like Tor, it
> runs on thousands of servers, thus rather distant from what "p2p"
> was supposed to mean. Tor started as P2P, but I think it isn't
> anymor
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:06 PM, carlo von lynX
wrote:
> I would add liberte' cables (http://dee.su/cables)
I did fill out the survey, actually — by request, so no idea why
Cables does not appear in the list above. The survey was clearly
composed by a domain expert, so props for the effort, and
Dan Meredith writes:
> OTF is entirely a publicly funded program. Support is given from the US
> Congress in an appropriation bill each year.
So it's funded by extortion ("taxation"). That's the kiss of death!
stealthmail (see .sig below) certainly qualifies for your criteria, but
to accept O
Dear LiberationTech,
finally, i'm honored and happy to share my findings with the WSJ. Follow an
article about Twitter underground economy on the homepage of the WSJ :
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304607104579212122084821400
best,
--
Andrea Stroppa
http://huffingtonpost
On Nov 25, 2013, at 1:51 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Personally, I'm not at all confident that we can do something
> that provides end-to-end security, can be deployed at full
> Internet scale and is compatible with today's email protocols.
> But if others are more optimistic then I'm all for '
Il 11/25/13, 11:34 PM, Tamzen Cannoy ha scritto:
> I think compatibility is the feature that will have to go. Kill SMTP and move
> on. You cannot rewrite ancient protocols that were never intended to be
> secure to add security. Go total secure and then allow people to back some of
> it out if t
Dear Libtech colleagues,
I'm looking for recommendations for a collaboration suite that fits the
following criteria for a colleague:
The suite ideally would have 2 key (and logically separate) pieces.
- First, an XMPP server that is encrypted/OTR (i.e. real-time chat). That’s
easy enough to
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> ...
> Important to note here is that by default, Enigmail adds the sender to
> the recipient list -- which is useful if you want to reread sent mail,
> but it also means that any encrypted mail contains not only the
> recipient key ID (which a
On 11/25/2013 06:03 PM, Robert Guerra wrote:
> - Second, however, is a collaborative document repository/authoring space.
> This space would necessarily include:
While your list of requirements is quite deep, I wonder if
EtherPad+OpenPGP would be a possible starting point for this.
Otherwise, on
On 11/25/2013 08:59 PM, Nathan of Guardian wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 06:03 PM, Robert Guerra wrote:
>> > - Second, however, is a collaborative document repository/authoring space.
>> > This space would necessarily include:
> While your list of requirements is quite deep, I wonder if
> EtherPad+OpenPG
18 matches
Mail list logo
