Bernard,
On Jun 19, 2012, at 1:37 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
> There are already live trials of LTE networks being rolled out in the UK
> where I am currently living using static addressing for some devices.
Interest. I guess they'll have to have a special profile for (e.g.) iPhones
sinc
Something I'm not seeing discussed much is that the fundamental shift
of "Who has this IP" doesn't change. Right now my ISP gives me a
single IPv4 address and I NAT behind it. If someone asks them "Who
has IP X at this time?" they can answer. That doesn't change with
IPv6. They assign me a /64.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 18 Jun 2012, at 21:23, David Conrad wrote:
> Bernard,
>
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:05 PM, ei8...@ei8fdb.org wrote:
>> I'm not an IPv6 expert, but any technical courses I have done on IPv6 have
>> promoted the complete trackability and ful
Bernard,
On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:05 PM, ei8...@ei8fdb.org wrote:
> I'm not an IPv6 expert, but any technical courses I have done on IPv6 have
> promoted the complete trackability and full audit-trail possible with IPv6 -
> each unique IPv6 host makes a direct connection to the other host, which
>
I'm not an IPv6 expert, but any technical courses I have done on IPv6
have promoted the complete trackability and full audit-trail possible
with IPv6 - each unique IPv6 host makes a direct connection to the other
host, which simplifies security, and routing.
There is no need to carry out NAT
Dear Seth,
Thank you for this tremendously helpful summary of the the situation &
potentials associated with IPv6. Your 'blog post' is enlightening,
worrying, but also giving hope at the same time.
One could conclude is that -like any technology- it is the service
providers and users who would de
Walid AL-SAQAF writes:
> Are we supposed to be more concerned or glad that we are slowly moving to
> IPv6 ?
I think the effect of IPv6 on privacy is complicated; it depends on how
addresses are allocated. It depends on what ISPs do and on what users do.
There's one debate about whether people
Hi all,
You may have read about the recent outcry by FBI and DEA warning that IPv6
could shield criminals from police as i makes tracing electronic addresses
'more difficult'.
See:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57453738-83/fbi-dea-warn-ipv6-could-shield-criminals-from-police/
If this is true
