On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
Failure, actually. It shows that democratic decisions
tend to produce technically suboptimal results.
The vote in this case shows that majority of subscribers value their
convenience more than cool stories of someone's past
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:37:50PM -0500, Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes
wrote:
The beauty of democracy! :-)
Failure, actually. It shows that democratic decisions
tend to produce technically suboptimal results.
That the whole list was spammed with voting traffic
just adds insult to injury
Andrés said:
The beauty of democracy! :-)
Well, the decision is binding and must be respected. But the issue
decided here is not the issue that was raised by Joseph Lorenzo Hall
and defined by Matt Mackall. We can see this from the comments that
accompany the public votes. One or two voters
PS - A fellow list administrator kindly points out that I'm wrong
about the actual configuration variables. And in that connection, I
also misrepresented what Karl was saying. (Sorry for the added noise
and confusion.) The actual config variables are:
(1) Should any existing Reply-To: header
We voted on #2 because that was the issue Joseph Lorenzo Hall raised (see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03767.html).
He specifically asked for the following:
Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not reply-all by default
been
broached? Maybe I'm
Yosem Companys compa...@stanford.edu writes:
We voted on #2 because that was the issue Joseph Lorenzo Hall raised
(see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03767.
html). He specifically asked for the following:
Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not
M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net writes:
Karl,
in this message from you there was one Reply-To header, set to:
Karl Fogel kfo...@red-bean.com,
liberationtech liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu
Thank you. Then we're at least avoiding the can't find my way back
home problem, which is
Hi all,
I'm not comfortable enough with this list to reply-all very often (while it's a
very informative list, the tenor doesn't match my own style, especially for a
list with public archives), and it is a non-standard configuration -- in my
experience -- to reply-to-list.
That being said,
The beauty of democracy! :-)
On Mar 27, 2013 10:20 PM, Yosem Companys compa...@stanford.edu wrote:
Dear Liberationtech list subscribers,
Thank you for your vote on the following question, Do you want replies to
Liberationtech list messages directed to reply-to-all or reply-to-poster?
Here
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes
alps6...@gmail.com wrote:
The beauty of democracy! :-)
...for some definitions of beauty but all definitions of democracy.
That's my love with all the warts and blemishes! :)
yrs,
--
Shava Nerad
shav...@gmail.com
--
Too
10 matches
Mail list logo
