Do you have a link for that? I can't imagine what Federal Law would
apply there.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/07/01/burglary.shooting.ap/index.html?section=cnn_latestr>
Frank Ortiz, a member of the loc
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, "goat!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
> As far as public land, that is what the vote is for.
>
> Goat
>
Not true. Use of public land is NOT up for vote.
It belongs to "the public" and "the public" cannot be denied use
thereof--and current gover
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, "Eric Pavao"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:34 PM, goat! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Yes, and people are still being prosecuted / ruined trying to stop
> > trespass on the borders.
>
> Huh? If you own land on the border (or
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, "goat!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, I'm talking about people being sued for stopping trespass on
> private land, and having everything they have taken.
>
By your reasoning, anyone who owns land on the Border ought to be able
to let in Mexicans
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Boyd Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> would you believe that there are some morons who want
> to try and have him indicted by a federal grand jury?
>
Do you have a link for that? I can't imagine what Federal Law would
apply there.
