On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Denis Bilenko denis.bile...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Marc Lehmann schm...@schmorp.de wrote:
The SIGCHLD is received, of course, but then libev fails to notify the
child watcher in a timely manner. Instead, it delays the notification
by
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:15:57PM +0400, Denis Bilenko
denis.bile...@gmail.com wrote:
There's another issue, in which libev does lose the signal forever. To
reproduce it, remove sleep(1) from the latest test program.
Hmm, it's been a long time - what exactly is the behaviour I am supposed
