On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:53:10AM +0200, Zsbán Ambrus amb...@math.bme.hu
wrote:
- if (expect_false (signum = 0 || signum EV_NSIG))
+ if (expect_false (signum = 0 || signum = EV_NSIG))
return;
--signum;
I think your reasoning is incorrect. While this may seem strange, 64
Hi,
Below is a patch that fixes a theoretical array overrun. I say theoretical
because I don't think there is a signal number high enough to trigger this. But
any ways... the issue is EV_NSIG starts off being 65. Then the array is declared
as signals [EV_NSIG - 1]; Which means 0-63 would be
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:43:03AM -0400, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
if signum is 65, it won't return. This gets decremented to 64 and then used as
an index for a memory write. This is 1 over the top since 63 is the largest
valid index. I doubt this causes any problems, but a patch
