bootstrap configure.ac generator m4
Makefile.am src
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:22:47PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
HI, Richard
Can you know what is missing when the following issue took place?
#gcc mount-local.c
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:40:03AM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
HI, Richard
Is there any plan to make daemon to directly run on the hypervisor,
not starting a guest? e.g. directly export a guest image to be a block
://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
___
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
--
Regards,
Zhi Yong Wu
___
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs
the complete, unedited
output to the libguestfs developers, either in a bug report
or on the libguestfs redhat com mailing list.
last error: Connection timed out
md: stopping all md devices.
Restarting system.
.
machine restart
#
--
Regards,
Zhi Yong Wu
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 04:30:37PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
HI,
On a RHEL5 box, i tried to directly run guest which was issued by
libguestfs virt-xxx commands as below. But after some minutes, it
exited
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:33:53PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
Which version of libguestfs is this? I think you'll have no hope of
#rpm
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:04:11PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:33:53PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Sun, Sep
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:43:17PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
Yeah, but why did it happen when i directly issue guest VM via above command?
OK I see. When libguestfs runs qemu-kvm, it sets up a TCP socket
first
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:55:04AM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:43:17PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
Yeah, but why
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:22:19AM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
Yes, I am trying to run it in Xen Domain0. I thought that we can use
Domain0 as a public libguestfs VM, This will avoid starting a new
guest for virt-xxx
HI,
As you've known, vhd-util and qemu-img both provide the capacity for
resizing the original disk, but why is virt-resize designed to involve
two disks, not only original disk? Is there any concern? Is it
possible that only one original disk is involved in virt-resize?
--
Regards,
Zhi Yong
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:19:21PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
As you've known, vhd-util and qemu-img both provide the capacity for
resizing the original disk,
.. although they only resize the container
12 matches
Mail list logo
