On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Roy Stogner wrote:
> Indeed it does! I can replicate that (seeing an exception in the
> ghosted vector support) just by switching ex14 to cubic hierarchics.
>
> I'll look into this ASAP.
I rooted out the problem I found, and the bug fix for that is in the
svn head now. Saur
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Saurabh Srivastava wrote:
I am currently using Libmesh to develop a fluid solver for coupling
with particles/structures. I have a few related questions ..
A) Does the reinit() function in equation system classs ..allows
solution to be projected onto new mesh? (as I recall
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote:
> Idea #4: Upon removing the columns of the matrix, automatically adjust
> the right hand side. I think this would actually be quite easy to do
> by the following procedure:
>
> 1. Remove the inactive rows of the matrix.
>
> 2. Let B denote the
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote:
> Idea #4: Upon removing the columns of the matrix, automatically adjust
> the right hand side. I think this would actually be quite easy to do
> by the following procedure:
>
> 1. Remove the inactive rows of the matrix.
>
> 2. Let B denote the a
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Derek Gaston wrote:
> I haven't followed this whole thread so forgive me if this has been
> explained... but how do you end up with a refined element (D) being
> in a different subdomain from it's parent (that made up ABCD)? Is
> your subdomain evolving throughout the simul
On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Tim Kroeger wrote:
> The next difficulty with my solve-on-part-of-domain stuff has now
> shown up. It is the constrained-dof issue now, which Roy already
> predicted and I didn't believe. Luckily enough, my application seems
> to be sufficiently complicated for any
The next difficulty with my solve-on-part-of-domain stuff has now
shown up. It is the constrained-dof issue now, which Roy already
predicted and I didn't believe. Luckily enough, my application seems
to be sufficiently complicated for any potential problem to actually
occur.
Let's assume the
